> And it's entirely likely that I'd thought of exactly that two years > ago when the DECL_THREAD_LOCAL test was omitted from that bit of code, > but I failed to add a comment. > > I guess this patch needs to be reverted...
It may be still a valid optimization, but only if you know there is no escapes of a static thread variable. But I didn't think this is known at this point. I suspect this would require adding another pass for this later in the optimization pipeline. -Andi -- a...@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
