On Thu, 7 Jan 2021, Jason Merrill wrote:

> On 1/7/21 10:10 AM, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > We shouldn't do replace_result_decl after evaluating a call that returns
> > a PMF because PMF temporaries aren't wrapped in a TARGET_EXPR (and so we
> > can't trust ctx->object), and PMF initializers can't be self-referential
> > anyway, so replace_result_decl would always be a no-op.  This fixes an
> > ICE from the sanity check in replace_result_decl in the below testcase
> > during cxx_eval_call_expression of the call f() in the initializer g(f()).
> > 
> > Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for
> > trunk?
> > 
> > gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
> > 
> >     PR c++/98551
> >     * constexpr.c (cxx_eval_call_expression): Don't call
> >     replace_result_decl when the result is a PMF.
> > 
> > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> > 
> >     PR c++/98551
> >     * g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-pmf2.C: New test.
> > ---
> >   gcc/cp/constexpr.c                          | 1 +
> >   gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-pmf2.C | 9 +++++++++
> >   2 files changed, 10 insertions(+)
> >   create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-pmf2.C
> > 
> > diff --git a/gcc/cp/constexpr.c b/gcc/cp/constexpr.c
> > index 0c12f608d36..a7272d49d0d 100644
> > --- a/gcc/cp/constexpr.c
> > +++ b/gcc/cp/constexpr.c
> > @@ -2788,6 +2788,7 @@ cxx_eval_call_expression (const constexpr_ctx *ctx,
> > tree t,
> >            current object under construction.  */
> >         if (!*non_constant_p && ctx->object
> >             && AGGREGATE_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (res))
> > +           && !TYPE_PTRMEMFUNC_P (TREE_TYPE (res))
> 
> It ought to work to change AGGREGATE_TYPE_P to CLASS_TYPE_P; we can't return
> an array, and a vector can't contain a pointer to itself.
> 
> Alternately, we could change the same-type assert in replace_result_decl to a
> test and return false if different.
> 
> OK with either change.

Sounds good.  I went with changing AGGREGATE_TYPE_P to CLASS_TYPE_P and
leaving alone the assert in replace_result_decl for now:

-- >8 --

Subject: [PATCH] c++: ICE with constexpr call that returns a PMF [PR98551]

We shouldn't do replace_result_decl after evaluating a call that returns
a PMF because PMF temporaries aren't wrapped in a TARGET_EXPR (and so we
can't trust ctx->object), and PMF initializers can't be self-referential
anyway, so replace_result_decl would always be a no-op.

To that end, this patch changes the relevant AGGREGATE_TYPE_P test to
CLASS_TYPE_P, which should rule out PMFs (as well as arrays, which we
can't return and therefore won't see here).  This fixes an ICE from the
sanity check in replace_result_decl in the below testcase during
constexpr evaluation of the call f() in the initializer g(f()).

gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

        PR c++/98551
        * constexpr.c (cxx_eval_call_expression): Check CLASS_TYPE_P
        instead of AGGREGATE_TYPE_P before calling replace_result_decl.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

        PR c++/98551
        * g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-pmf2.C: New test.
---
 gcc/cp/constexpr.c                          | 2 +-
 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-pmf2.C | 9 +++++++++
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-pmf2.C

diff --git a/gcc/cp/constexpr.c b/gcc/cp/constexpr.c
index 4a5e6384da6..9dddc53ca52 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/constexpr.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/constexpr.c
@@ -2790,7 +2790,7 @@ cxx_eval_call_expression (const constexpr_ctx *ctx, tree 
t,
            /* Rewrite all occurrences of the function's RESULT_DECL with the
               current object under construction.  */
            if (!*non_constant_p && ctx->object
-               && AGGREGATE_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (res))
+               && CLASS_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (res))
                && !is_empty_class (TREE_TYPE (res)))
              if (replace_result_decl (&result, res, ctx->object))
                cacheable = false;
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-pmf2.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-pmf2.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..a76e712afe1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-pmf2.C
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+// PR c++/98551
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+struct A {};
+struct B { int t(); };
+using pmf = decltype(&B::t);
+constexpr pmf f() { return &B::t; }
+constexpr A g(pmf) { return {}; };
+constexpr A x = g(f());
-- 
2.30.0

Reply via email to