On Mon, 21 Dec 2020, Iain Sandoe wrote: > Hi Joseph, > > Nathan has approved this from the C++ perspective (and Martin said that his > comments were "not necessarily to object to the idea behind the attribute but > to draw attention to the fact that it's not suitable for standard APIs.”) > > So, I wonder, do you have more comments on the revised patch, or is this > now OK for master?
If <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-November/558630.html> is the current version, one of the three copies of the attribute documentation (the one for it as a function attribute) starts with "The @code{deprecated} attribute results in an error", when it should refer to @code{unavailable} not @code{deprecated}. I don't have further comments beyond that. -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
