On Sun, 13 Dec 2020 at 20:14, abebeos <lazaridis.com+abeb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 at 20:32, Jeff Law <l...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On 12/9/20 6:12 AM, abebeos via Gcc-patches wrote: >> > Essence: >> > >> > I need a confirmation that the testsuite setup as presented in: >> > >> > https://github.com/abebeos/avr-gnu >> > >> > works fine. >> > >> > The problem with the avr target is that the testsuite cannot be run >> easily, >> > mainly because of the need for a special simulated-target setup, which >> does >> > not work for avr as documented. This led developers to a dead-end with >> > their non-cc0-avr-backends (the non-cc0 backend is needed thus avr is >> not >> > dropped from gcc11). >> > >> > I integrated a toolchain/testsetup to be able to run the gcc testsuite >> > against a simulated avr target. >> > >> > I then used this toolchain to test 2 different existent >> > non-cc0-avr-backends (from pipcet and saaadhu, both github). >> > >> > The result is that saaadhu's backend seems to be working 100%. It has >> > identical testsuite results with the existing (but deprecated) >> cc0-backend, >> > which means that it can be used "as-is" for inclusion in gcc11. >> > >> > Please note that I did this work in context of a bounty @ bountysouce, >> more >> > information within the issue: >> > >> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92729#c35 >> I haven't looked at the github repo. But I do have a couple comments >> here. >> >> First, the author of the changes (pipcet and saaadhu) need to have >> copyright assignments on file with the FSF. Otherwise we can not use >> their work at all. >> >> Second, the work needs to be submitted for inclusion. I don't recall >> seeing an official submission from either of them to gcc-patches. >> >> I'm definitely curious about the testing setup and whether or not it can >> be replicated into our Jenkins setup. > > > Where can I find this Jenkins setup? > To close this: assuming " into our Jenkins setup" is some redhat internal jenkins setup. > It is my understanding there is >> no newlib support for avr so I'm curious what you're using for a basic >> runtime library. >> >> jeff >> >>
