On Fri, 20 Nov 2020, Jeff Law wrote: > Sweet. OK once the prereqs are all ACK'd.
Thank you for your review. I have applied all the changes now, as posted in their most recent versions, except for 01/31 where I have noticed an anomaly in the included gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr58901-?.c test cases where the typedefs have been mistakenly swapped between them (obviously I meant to use `signed int' for the test case using a bit-field and not the other one, as otherwise the `signed' qualifier is redundant). I have adjusted the typedefs then, and committed an updated version as obviously correct (I double-checked they both still fail in the absence of the associated code update). While doing that I realised that "bit-field" is the correct spelling of the term both with the ISO C standard and the VAX ISA documentation, and also our predominantly used version in preference to "bitfield". I have updated all the commit messages accordingly then; there have been no new use cases in actual change bodies, so no change there. I'll yet get through the discussions and see if there is anything I would like to comment on that I missed. That may not be today though. Maciej
