On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 2:35 PM Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 02:30:45PM +0100, Martin Liška wrote: > > On 12/4/20 10:03 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > > > Otherwise 0001- looks good to me. > > > > Pushed that to master. > > > > > As said I'd like to see opinions > > > from others on the > > > driver / backend communication for 0002. > > > > To be honest, we moved back to the original implementation which used > > a temporary file. There hasn't been any opinion for last 8 months :( > > Using environment variable rather than a temporary file must be faster.
But it's difficult to preserve behavior with -save-temps and execing cc1 as printed which is why I don't like it too much, even if it is "faster". The environment might also be of limited size and with including everything (-I... -L...) and always (a defect of the patch) I fear we might run over its size limits on some host OSs at least. Richard. > Jakub >
