On 12/2/20 6:18 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
-fsanitize=vptr initializes all vtable pointers to null so that it can catch invalid calls; see cp_ubsan_maybe_initialize_vtbl_ptrs. That means that evaluating a vtable reference can produce a null pointer in this mode, so cxx_eval_dynamic_cast_fn should check that.
Yes, but we shouldn't accept it silently; sanitize is supposed to flag undefined behavior, not allow it. If we see a null vptr, we should complain and set *non_constant_p.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk? gcc/cp/ChangeLog: PR c++/98103 * constexpr.c (cxx_eval_dynamic_cast_fn): If the evaluating of vtable yields a null pointer, return. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: PR c++/98103 * g++.dg/ubsan/vptr-18.C: New test. --- gcc/cp/constexpr.c | 4 +++- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ubsan/vptr-18.C | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ubsan/vptr-18.C diff --git a/gcc/cp/constexpr.c b/gcc/cp/constexpr.c index 9a1a1db1267..8c6a9cf2b40 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/constexpr.c +++ b/gcc/cp/constexpr.c @@ -1996,7 +1996,9 @@ cxx_eval_dynamic_cast_fn (const constexpr_ctx *ctx, tree call, tree vtable = build_vfield_ref (obj, TREE_TYPE (obj)); vtable = cxx_eval_constant_expression (ctx, vtable, /*lval*/false, non_constant_p, overflow_p); - if (*non_constant_p) + /* With -fsanitize=vptr, we initialize all vtable pointers to null, + so it's possible that we got a null pointer now. */ + if (*non_constant_p || integer_zerop (vtable)) return call; /* VTABLE will be &_ZTV1A + 16 or similar, get _ZTV1A. */ vtable = extract_obj_from_addr_offset (vtable); diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ubsan/vptr-18.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ubsan/vptr-18.C new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9f421c269bc --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ubsan/vptr-18.C @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +// PR c++/98103 +// { dg-do compile { target c++20 } } +// { dg-additional-options "-fsanitize=vptr" } +// Modified constexpr-dynamic17.C. -fsanitize=vptr initializes all vtable +// pointers to null, so we don't get the "accessing uninitialized member" +// error. + +struct V { + virtual void f(); +}; + +struct A : V { }; + +struct B : V { + constexpr B(V*, A*); +}; + +struct D : B, A { + constexpr D() : B((A*)this, this) { } +}; + +constexpr B::B(V* v, A* a) +{ + dynamic_cast<B*>(a); +} + +constexpr D d; base-commit: dc2b372ed1b1e9af6db45051cff95478c7616807