Hi Christophe, Thanks for these! See some inline comments.
On 25/11/2020 13:54, Christophe Lyon via Gcc-patches wrote:
The predicate on the second operand is more restrictive than the one in expand 'neon_inv_logic_op2'. This should still work with immediates, or well I checked for integers, it generates a loop as such:This patch enables MVE vandq instructions for auto-vectorization. MVE vandq insns in mve.md are modified to use 'and' instead of unspec expression to support and<mode>3. The and<mode>3 expander is added to vec-common.md 2020-11-12 Christophe Lyon <christophe.l...@linaro.org> gcc/ * gcc/config/arm/iterators.md (supf): Remove VANDQ_S and VANDQ_U. (VANQ): Remove. * config/arm/mve.md (mve_vandq_u<mode>): New entry for vand instruction using expression and. (mve_vandq_s<mode>): New expander. * config/arm/neon.md (and<mode>3): Renamed into and<mode>3_neon. * config/arm/unspecs.md (VANDQ_S, VANDQ_U): Remove. * config/arm/vec-common.md (and<mode>3): New expander. gcc/testsuite/ * gcc.target/arm/simd/mve-vand.c: New test. --- gcc/config/arm/iterators.md | 4 +--- gcc/config/arm/mve.md | 20 ++++++++++++---- gcc/config/arm/neon.md | 2 +- gcc/config/arm/unspecs.md | 2 -- gcc/config/arm/vec-common.md | 15 ++++++++++++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/simd/mve-vand.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 6 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/simd/mve-vand.c diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/iterators.md b/gcc/config/arm/iterators.md index 592af35..72039e4 100644 --- a/gcc/config/arm/iterators.md +++ b/gcc/config/arm/iterators.md @@ -1232,8 +1232,7 @@ (define_int_attr supf [(VCVTQ_TO_F_S "s") (VCVTQ_TO_F_U "u") (VREV16Q_S "s") (VADDLVQ_P_U "u") (VCMPNEQ_U "u") (VCMPNEQ_S "s") (VABDQ_M_S "s") (VABDQ_M_U "u") (VABDQ_S "s") (VABDQ_U "u") (VADDQ_N_S "s") (VADDQ_N_U "u") - (VADDVQ_P_S "s") (VADDVQ_P_U "u") (VANDQ_S "s") - (VANDQ_U "u") (VBICQ_S "s") (VBICQ_U "u") + (VADDVQ_P_S "s") (VADDVQ_P_U "u") (VBICQ_S "s") (VBICQ_U "u") (VBRSRQ_N_S "s") (VBRSRQ_N_U "u") (VCADDQ_ROT270_S "s") (VCADDQ_ROT270_U "u") (VCADDQ_ROT90_S "s") (VCMPEQQ_S "s") (VCMPEQQ_U "u") (VCADDQ_ROT90_U "u") @@ -1501,7 +1500,6 @@ (define_int_iterator VABDQ [VABDQ_S VABDQ_U]) (define_int_iterator VADDQ_N [VADDQ_N_S VADDQ_N_U]) (define_int_iterator VADDVAQ [VADDVAQ_S VADDVAQ_U]) (define_int_iterator VADDVQ_P [VADDVQ_P_U VADDVQ_P_S]) -(define_int_iterator VANDQ [VANDQ_U VANDQ_S]) (define_int_iterator VBICQ [VBICQ_S VBICQ_U]) (define_int_iterator VBRSRQ_N [VBRSRQ_N_U VBRSRQ_N_S]) (define_int_iterator VCADDQ_ROT270 [VCADDQ_ROT270_S VCADDQ_ROT270_U]) diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/mve.md b/gcc/config/arm/mve.md index ecbaaa9..975eb7d 100644 --- a/gcc/config/arm/mve.md +++ b/gcc/config/arm/mve.md @@ -894,17 +894,27 @@ (define_insn "mve_vaddvq_p_<supf><mode>" ;; ;; [vandq_u, vandq_s]) ;; -(define_insn "mve_vandq_<supf><mode>" +;; signed and unsigned versions are the same: define the unsigned +;; insn, and use an expander for the signed one as we still reference +;; both names from arm_mve.h. +(define_insn "mve_vandq_u<mode>" [ (set (match_operand:MVE_2 0 "s_register_operand" "=w") - (unspec:MVE_2 [(match_operand:MVE_2 1 "s_register_operand" "w") - (match_operand:MVE_2 2 "s_register_operand" "w")] - VANDQ)) + (and:MVE_2 (match_operand:MVE_2 1 "s_register_operand" "w") + (match_operand:MVE_2 2 "s_register_operand" "w")))
vldrw.32 q3, [r0] vldr.64 d4, .L8 vldr.64 d5, .L8+8 vand q3, q3, q2 vstrw.32 q3, [r2]MVE does support vand's with immediates, just like NEON, I suspect you could just copy the way Neon handles these, possibly worth the little extra effort. You can use dest[i] = a[i] & ~1 as a testcase. If you don't it might still be worth expanding the test to make sure other immediates-types combinations don't trigger an ICE?
I'm not sure I understand why it loads it in two 64-bit chunks and not do a single load or not just do something like a vmov or vbic immediate. Anyhow that's a worry for another day I guess..
] "TARGET_HAVE_MVE" - "vand %q0, %q1, %q2" + "vand\t%q0, %q1, %q2" [(set_attr "type" "mve_move") ]) +(define_expand "mve_vandq_s<mode>" + [ + (set (match_operand:MVE_2 0 "s_register_operand") + (and:MVE_2 (match_operand:MVE_2 1 "s_register_operand") + (match_operand:MVE_2 2 "s_register_operand"))) + ] + "TARGET_HAVE_MVE" +);;;; [vbicq_s, vbicq_u]) diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/neon.md b/gcc/config/arm/neon.md index 2d76769..dc4707d 100644 --- a/gcc/config/arm/neon.md +++ b/gcc/config/arm/neon.md @@ -712,7 +712,7 @@ (define_insn "ior<mode>3" ;; corresponds to the canonical form the middle-end expects to use for ;; immediate bitwise-ANDs.-(define_insn "and<mode>3"+(define_insn "and<mode>3_neon" [(set (match_operand:VDQ 0 "s_register_operand" "=w,w") (and:VDQ (match_operand:VDQ 1 "s_register_operand" "w,0") (match_operand:VDQ 2 "neon_inv_logic_op2" "w,DL")))] diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/unspecs.md b/gcc/config/arm/unspecs.md index a3844e9..e8bf68e 100644 --- a/gcc/config/arm/unspecs.md +++ b/gcc/config/arm/unspecs.md @@ -601,7 +601,6 @@ (define_c_enum "unspec" [ VADDQ_N_S VADDVAQ_S VADDVQ_P_S - VANDQ_S VBICQ_S VBRSRQ_N_S VCADDQ_ROT270_S @@ -648,7 +647,6 @@ (define_c_enum "unspec" [ VADDQ_N_U VADDVAQ_U VADDVQ_P_U - VANDQ_U VBICQ_U VBRSRQ_N_U VCADDQ_ROT270_U diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/vec-common.md b/gcc/config/arm/vec-common.md index 250e503..3dd694c 100644 --- a/gcc/config/arm/vec-common.md +++ b/gcc/config/arm/vec-common.md @@ -172,3 +172,18 @@ (define_expand "vec_set<mode>" GEN_INT (elem), operands[0])); DONE; }) + +(define_expand "and<mode>3" + [(set (match_operand:VNIM1 0 "s_register_operand" "") + (and:VNIM1 (match_operand:VNIM1 1 "s_register_operand" "") + (match_operand:VNIM1 2 "neon_inv_logic_op2" "")))] + "TARGET_NEON + || (TARGET_HAVE_MVE && VALID_MVE_SI_MODE (<MODE>mode))" +) + +(define_expand "and<mode>3" + [(set (match_operand:VNINOTM1 0 "s_register_operand" "") + (and:VNINOTM1 (match_operand:VNINOTM1 1 "s_register_operand" "") + (match_operand:VNINOTM1 2 "neon_inv_logic_op2" "")))] + "TARGET_NEON" +) diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/simd/mve-vand.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/simd/mve-vand.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..2e30cd0 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/simd/mve-vand.c @@ -0,0 +1,34 @@ +/* { dg-do assemble } */ +/* { dg-require-effective-target arm_v8_1m_mve_ok } */ +/* { dg-add-options arm_v8_1m_mve } */ +/* { dg-additional-options "-O3" } */ + +#include <stdint.h> + +#define FUNC(SIGN, TYPE, BITS, NB, OP, NAME) \ + void test_ ## NAME ##_ ## SIGN ## BITS ## x ## NB (TYPE##BITS##_t * __restrict__ dest, TYPE##BITS##_t *a, TYPE##BITS##_t *b) { \ + int i; \ + for (i=0; i<NB; i++) { \ + dest[i] = a[i] OP b[i]; \ + } \ +} + +/* 64-bit vectors. */ +FUNC(s, int, 32, 2, &, vand) +FUNC(u, uint, 32, 2, &, vand) +FUNC(s, int, 16, 4, &, vand) +FUNC(u, uint, 16, 4, &, vand) +FUNC(s, int, 8, 8, &, vand) +FUNC(u, uint, 8, 8, &, vand) + +/* 128-bit vectors. */ +FUNC(s, int, 32, 4, &, vand) +FUNC(u, uint, 32, 4, &, vand) +FUNC(s, int, 16, 8, &, vand) +FUNC(u, uint, 16, 8, &, vand) +FUNC(s, int, 8, 16, &, vand) +FUNC(u, uint, 8, 16, &, vand) + +/* MVE has only 128-bit vectors, so we can vectorize only half of the + functions above. */ +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {vand\tq[0-9]+, q[0-9]+, q[0-9]+} 6 } } */