> On Nov 19, 2020, at 10:38 PM, Maciej W. Rozycki <ma...@linux-mips.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> [Paul, there's a PDP11 piece for you further down here and then 29/31.]
> 
> ...
> 
> Then there is a fix for the PDP11 backend addressing an issue I found in 
> the handling of floating-point comparisons.  Unlike all the other changes 
> this one has not been regression-tested, not even built as I have no idea 
> how to prepare a development environment for a PDP11 target (also none of 
> my VAX pieces is old enough to support PDP11 machine code execution).

I agree this is a correct change, interesting that it was missed before.  You'd 
expect some ICE issues from that mistake.  Perhaps there were and I didn't 
realize the cause; the PDP11 test run is not yet fully clean.

I've hacked together a primitive newlib based "bare metal" execution test setup 
that uses SIMH, but it's not a particularly clean setup.  And it hasn't been 
posted, I hope to be able to do that at some point.

Thanks for the fix.

        paul

Reply via email to