On Fri, 13 Nov 2020, H.J. Lu via Gcc-patches wrote: > Done. Here is the updated patch.
Hi. I see a test-case for this kind of construct: int foo __attribute__((__used__, __section__ (".bar"))) = 42; and IIUC that it's handled as I'd hope (setting "R" on the named section, not another derived section), good. Could you also add a test-case that the same construct *without* a specific initializer is handled the same way? I.e.: int foo __attribute__((__used__, __section__ (".bar"))); Thanks in advance. brgds, H-P