On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis <g...@integrable-solutions.net> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Richard Guenther > <richard.guent...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> I think we should issue a diagnostic about the combination of these >>> two flags. Silent ignorance would lead to false user expectations >>> and supposed "bug" reports, if not confusion. >> >> I'm not sure what "expectation" there would be? > > that PCH works with LTO :-) > > (especially when PCH means precompiled header :-)
Sure it works. PCH is just a stage where LTO is not active yet. Richard. > -- Gaby
