On 10/29/20 11:00 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 02:25:33PM -0400, Jason Merrill via Gcc-patches wrote:
On 10/29/20 2:11 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 11:17:37AM -0400, Jason Merrill via Gcc-patches wrote:
On 10/28/20 7:40 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 03:09:08PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 10/28/20 1:58 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 01:26:53AM -0400, Jason Merrill via Gcc-patches wrote:
On 10/24/20 7:40 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 09:33:38PM -0400, Jason Merrill via Gcc-patches wrote:
On 10/23/20 3:01 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
This patch implements the -Wvexing-parse warning to warn about the
sneaky most vexing parse rule in C++: the cases when a declaration
looks like a variable definition, but the C++ language requires it
to be interpreted as a function declaration. This warning is on by
default (like clang++). From the docs:
void f(double a) {
int i(); // extern int i (void);
int n(int(a)); // extern int n (int);
}
Another example:
struct S { S(int); };
void f(double a) {
S x(int(a)); // extern struct S x (int);
S y(int()); // extern struct S y (int (*) (void));
S z(); // extern struct S z (void);
}
You can find more on this in [dcl.ambig.res].
I spent a fair amount of time on fix-it hints so that GCC can recommend
various ways to resolve such an ambiguity. Sometimes that's tricky.
E.g., suggesting default-initialization when the class doesn't have
a default constructor would not be optimal. Suggesting {}-init is also
not trivial because it can use an initializer-list constructor if no
default constructor is available (which ()-init wouldn't do). And of
course, pre-C++11, we shouldn't be recommending {}-init at all.
What do you think of, instead of passing the type down into the declarator
parse, adding the paren locations to cp_declarator::function and giving the
diagnostic from cp_parser_init_declarator instead?
Oops, now I see there's already cp_declarator::parenthesized; might as well
reuse that. And maybe change it to a range, while we're at it.
I'm afraid I can't reuse it because grokdeclarator uses it to warn about
"unnecessary parentheses in declaration". So when we have:
int (x());
declarator->parenthesized points to the outer parens (if any), whereas
declarator->u.function.parens_loc should point to the inner ones. We also
have declarator->id_loc but I think we should only use it for declarator-ids.
Makes sense.
(We should still adjust ->parenthesized to be a range to generate a better
diagnostic; I shall send a patch soon.)
Hmm, I wonder why we have the parenthesized_p parameter to some of these
functions, since we can look at the declarator to find that information...
That would be a nice cleanup.
Interesting idea. I suppose it's better, and makes the implementation
more localized. The approach here is that if the .function.parens_loc
is UNKNOWN_LOCATION, we've not seen a vexing parse.
I'd rather always set the parens location, and then analyze the
cp_declarator in warn_about_ambiguous_parse to see if it's a vexing parse;
we should have all the information we need.
I could always set .parens_loc, but then I'd still need another flag telling
me whether we had an ambiguity. Otherwise I don't know how I would tell
apart e.g. "int f()" (warn) v. "int f(void)" (don't warn), etc.
Ah, I was thinking that we still had the parameter declarators, but now I
see that cp_parser_parameter_declaration_list groks them and returns a
TREE_LIST. We could set a TREE_LANG_FLAG on each TREE_LIST if its parameter
declarator was parenthesized?
I think so, looks like we have a bunch of free TREE_LANG_FLAG slots on
a TREE_LIST. But cp_parser_parameter_declaration_clause can return
a void_list_node, so I assume I'd have to copy_node it before setting
some new flag in it. Do you think that'd be fine?
There's no declarator in a void_list_node, so we shouldn't need to set a
"declarator is parenthesized" flag on it.
I guess I'm still not clear on how I would distinguish between
int f() and int f(void). When I look at the cdk_function declarator,
all I can see is the .parameters TREE_LIST, which for both cases will
be the same void_list_node, but we should only warn for the former.
What am I missing?
I'm just being dense. You're right that we would need to distinguish those
two. Perhaps an explicit_void_parms_node or something like that for during
parsing; it looks like grokparms will turn it into void_list_node as other
code expects.
Gotcha. Now we do most of the work in warn_about_ambiguous_parse.
Thanks, just a few tweaks left.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk?
-- >8 --
This patch implements the -Wvexing-parse warning to warn about the
sneaky most vexing parse rule in C++: the cases when a declaration
looks like a variable definition, but the C++ language requires it
to be interpreted as a function declaration. This warning is on by
default (like clang++). From the docs:
void f(double a) {
int i(); // extern int i (void);
int n(int(a)); // extern int n (int);
}
Another example:
struct S { S(int); };
void f(double a) {
S x(int(a)); // extern struct S x (int);
S y(int()); // extern struct S y (int (*) (void));
S z(); // extern struct S z (void);
}
You can find more on this in [dcl.ambig.res].
I spent a fair amount of time on fix-it hints so that GCC can recommend
various ways to resolve such an ambiguity. Sometimes that's tricky.
E.g., suggesting default-initialization when the class doesn't have
a default constructor would not be optimal. Suggesting {}-init is also
not trivial because it can use an initializer-list constructor if no
default constructor is available (which ()-init wouldn't do). And of
course, pre-C++11, we shouldn't be recommending {}-init at all.
I also uncovered a bug in cp_parser_declarator, where we were setting
*parenthesized_p to true despite the comment saying the exact opposite.
gcc/c-family/ChangeLog:
PR c++/25814
* c.opt (Wvexing-parse): New option.
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
PR c++/25814
* cp-tree.h (enum cp_tree_index): Add CPTI_EXPLICIT_VOID_LIST.
(explicit_void_list_node): Define.
(PARENTHESIZED_LIST_P): New macro.
(struct cp_declarator): Add function::parens_loc.
* decl.c (cxx_init_decl_processing): Initialize explicit_void_list_node.
(grokparms): Also break when explicit_void_list_node.
* parser.c (make_call_declarator): New location_t parameter. Use it
to set declarator->u.function.parens_loc.
(cp_parser_lambda_declarator_opt): Pass UNKNOWN_LOCATION to
make_call_declarator.
(warn_about_ambiguous_parse): New function.
(cp_parser_init_declarator): Call warn_about_ambiguous_parse.
(cp_parser_declarator): Set *parenthesized_p to false rather than to
true.
(cp_parser_direct_declarator): Create a location for the function's
parentheses and pass it to make_call_declarator.
(cp_parser_parameter_declaration_clause): Return explicit_void_list_node
for (void).
(cp_parser_parameter_declaration_list): Set PARENTHESIZED_LIST_P
in the parameters tree.
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR c++/25814
* doc/invoke.texi: Document -Wvexing-parse.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR c++/25814
* g++.dg/cpp2a/fn-template16.C: Add a dg-warning.
* g++.dg/cpp2a/fn-template7.C: Likewise.
* g++.dg/lookup/pr80891-5.C: Likewise.
* g++.dg/lto/pr79050_0.C: Add extern.
* g++.dg/lto/pr84805_0.C: Likewise.
* g++.dg/parse/pr58898.C: Add a dg-warning.
* g++.dg/template/scope5.C: Likewise.
* g++.old-deja/g++.brendan/recurse.C: Likewise.
* g++.old-deja/g++.jason/template4.C: Likewise.
* g++.old-deja/g++.law/arm4.C: Likewise.
* g++.old-deja/g++.mike/for2.C: Likewise.
* g++.old-deja/g++.other/local4.C: Likewise.
* g++.old-deja/g++.pt/crash3.C: Likewise.
* g++.dg/warn/Wvexing-parse.C: New test.
* g++.dg/warn/Wvexing-parse2.C: New test.
* g++.dg/warn/Wvexing-parse3.C: New test.
* g++.dg/warn/Wvexing-parse4.C: New test.
* g++.dg/warn/Wvexing-parse5.C: New test.
* g++.dg/warn/Wvexing-parse6.C: New test.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
PR c++/25814
* testsuite/20_util/reference_wrapper/lwg2993.cc: Add a dg-warning.
* testsuite/25_algorithms/generate_n/87982_neg.cc: Likewise.
---
gcc/c-family/c.opt | 4 +
gcc/cp/cp-tree.h | 8 +
gcc/cp/decl.c | 5 +-
gcc/cp/parser.c | 144 +++++++++++++++++-
gcc/doc/invoke.texi | 34 ++++-
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/fn-template16.C | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/fn-template7.C | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/pr80891-5.C | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lto/pr79050_0.C | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lto/pr84805_0.C | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/pr58898.C | 4 +-
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/scope5.C | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wvexing-parse.C | 110 +++++++++++++
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wvexing-parse2.C | 24 +++
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wvexing-parse3.C | 129 ++++++++++++++++
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wvexing-parse4.C | 74 +++++++++
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wvexing-parse5.C | 14 ++
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wvexing-parse6.C | 24 +++
.../g++.old-deja/g++.brendan/recurse.C | 2 +-
.../g++.old-deja/g++.jason/template4.C | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.law/arm4.C | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.mike/for2.C | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.other/local4.C | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.pt/crash3.C | 2 +
.../20_util/reference_wrapper/lwg2993.cc | 2 +-
.../25_algorithms/generate_n/87982_neg.cc | 2 +-
26 files changed, 578 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wvexing-parse.C
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wvexing-parse2.C
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wvexing-parse3.C
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wvexing-parse4.C
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wvexing-parse5.C
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wvexing-parse6.C
diff --git a/gcc/c-family/c.opt b/gcc/c-family/c.opt
index 10e53ea67c9..0991094e34d 100644
--- a/gcc/c-family/c.opt
+++ b/gcc/c-family/c.opt
@@ -1274,6 +1274,10 @@ Wvarargs
C ObjC C++ ObjC++ Warning Var(warn_varargs) Init(1)
Warn about questionable usage of the macros used to retrieve variable
arguments.
+Wvexing-parse
+C++ ObjC++ Warning Var(warn_vexing_parse) Init(1)
+Warn about the most vexing parse syntactic ambiguity.
+
Wvla
C ObjC C++ ObjC++ Var(warn_vla) Init(-1) Warning
Warn if a variable length array is used.
diff --git a/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h b/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
index fdb8ee57f0b..b044098277c 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
+++ b/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
@@ -125,6 +125,7 @@ enum cp_tree_index
CPTI_CLASS_TYPE,
CPTI_UNKNOWN_TYPE,
CPTI_INIT_LIST_TYPE,
+ CPTI_EXPLICIT_VOID_LIST,
CPTI_VTBL_TYPE,
CPTI_VTBL_PTR_TYPE,
CPTI_STD,
@@ -232,6 +233,7 @@ extern GTY(()) tree cp_global_trees[CPTI_MAX];
#define class_type_node cp_global_trees[CPTI_CLASS_TYPE]
#define unknown_type_node cp_global_trees[CPTI_UNKNOWN_TYPE]
#define init_list_type_node cp_global_trees[CPTI_INIT_LIST_TYPE]
+#define explicit_void_list_node
cp_global_trees[CPTI_EXPLICIT_VOID_LIST]
#define vtbl_type_node cp_global_trees[CPTI_VTBL_TYPE]
#define vtbl_ptr_type_node cp_global_trees[CPTI_VTBL_PTR_TYPE]
#define std_node cp_global_trees[CPTI_STD]
@@ -413,6 +415,7 @@ extern GTY(()) tree cp_global_trees[CPTI_MAX];
ATTR_IS_DEPENDENT (in the TREE_LIST for an attribute)
ABI_TAG_IMPLICIT (in the TREE_LIST for the argument of abi_tag)
LAMBDA_CAPTURE_EXPLICIT_P (in a TREE_LIST in LAMBDA_EXPR_CAPTURE_LIST)
+ PARENTHESIZED_LIST_P (in the TREE_LIST for a parameter-declaration-list)
CONSTRUCTOR_IS_DIRECT_INIT (in CONSTRUCTOR)
LAMBDA_EXPR_CAPTURES_THIS_P (in LAMBDA_EXPR)
DECLTYPE_FOR_LAMBDA_CAPTURE (in DECLTYPE_TYPE)
@@ -3395,6 +3398,10 @@ struct GTY(()) lang_decl {
was inherited from a template parameter, not explicitly indicated. */
#define ABI_TAG_IMPLICIT(NODE) TREE_LANG_FLAG_0 (TREE_LIST_CHECK (NODE))
+/* In a TREE_LIST for a parameter-declaration-list, indicates that this
+ list was enclosed in (). */
+#define PARENTHESIZED_LIST_P(NODE) TREE_LANG_FLAG_0 (TREE_LIST_CHECK (NODE))
+
/* Non zero if this is a using decl for a dependent scope. */
#define DECL_DEPENDENT_P(NODE) DECL_LANG_FLAG_0 (USING_DECL_CHECK (NODE))
@@ -6051,6 +6058,7 @@ struct cp_declarator {
tree late_return_type;
/* The trailing requires-clause, if any. */
tree requires_clause;
+ location_t parens_loc;
} function;
/* For arrays. */
struct {
diff --git a/gcc/cp/decl.c b/gcc/cp/decl.c
index 39f56b81275..81666fecfcb 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/decl.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/decl.c
@@ -4378,6 +4378,9 @@ cxx_init_decl_processing (void)
init_list_type_node = make_node (LANG_TYPE);
record_unknown_type (init_list_type_node, "init list");
+ /* Used when parsing to distinguish parameter-lists () and (void). */
+ explicit_void_list_node = build_void_list_node ();
+
{
/* Make sure we get a unique function type, so we can give
its pointer type a name. (This wins for gdb.) */
@@ -14033,7 +14036,7 @@ grokparms (tree parmlist, tree *parms)
tree init = TREE_PURPOSE (parm);
tree decl = TREE_VALUE (parm);
- if (parm == void_list_node)
+ if (parm == void_list_node || parm == explicit_void_list_node)
break;
Is this hunk needed? I thought explicit_void_type_node would be handled
by the if (VOID_TYPE_P) block below.
if (! decl || TREE_TYPE (decl) == error_mark_node)
diff --git a/gcc/cp/parser.c b/gcc/cp/parser.c
index bd8c241dd82..00a419032af 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/parser.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/parser.c
@@ -1438,7 +1438,8 @@ clear_decl_specs (cp_decl_specifier_seq *decl_specs)
VAR_DECLs or FUNCTION_DECLs) should do that directly. */
static cp_declarator *make_call_declarator
- (cp_declarator *, tree, cp_cv_quals, cp_virt_specifiers, cp_ref_qualifier,
tree, tree, tree, tree);
+ (cp_declarator *, tree, cp_cv_quals, cp_virt_specifiers, cp_ref_qualifier,
+ tree, tree, tree, tree, location_t);
static cp_declarator *make_array_declarator
(cp_declarator *, tree);
static cp_declarator *make_pointer_declarator
@@ -1621,7 +1622,8 @@ make_call_declarator (cp_declarator *target,
tree tx_qualifier,
tree exception_specification,
tree late_return_type,
- tree requires_clause)
+ tree requires_clause,
+ location_t parens_loc)
{
cp_declarator *declarator;
@@ -1635,6 +1637,7 @@ make_call_declarator (cp_declarator *target,
declarator->u.function.exception_specification = exception_specification;
declarator->u.function.late_return_type = late_return_type;
declarator->u.function.requires_clause = requires_clause;
+ declarator->u.function.parens_loc = parens_loc;
if (target)
{
declarator->id_loc = target->id_loc;
@@ -11246,7 +11249,8 @@ cp_parser_lambda_declarator_opt (cp_parser* parser,
tree lambda_expr)
tx_qual,
exception_spec,
return_type,
- trailing_requires_clause);
+ trailing_requires_clause,
+ UNKNOWN_LOCATION);
declarator->std_attributes = std_attrs;
fco = grokmethod (&return_type_specs,
@@ -20613,6 +20617,112 @@ strip_declarator_types (tree type, cp_declarator
*declarator)
return type;
}
+/* Warn about the most vexing parse syntactic ambiguity, i.e., warn when
+ a construct looks like a variable definition but is actually a function
+ declaration. TYPE is the return type of such a function; DECLARATOR is
+ the declarator for this function declaration. */
+
+static void
+warn_about_ambiguous_parse (tree type, const cp_declarator *declarator)
+{
+ if (declarator->kind != cdk_function
+ || !declarator->declarator
+ || declarator->declarator->kind != cdk_id
+ || !identifier_p (get_unqualified_id
+ (const_cast<cp_declarator *>(declarator))))
+ return;
+
+ /* Don't warn when the whole declarator (not just the declarator-id!)
+ was parenthesized. That is, don't warn for int(n()) but do warn
+ for int(f)(). */
+ if (declarator->parenthesized != UNKNOWN_LOCATION)
+ return;
+
+ location_t loc = declarator->u.function.parens_loc;
+ if (loc == UNKNOWN_LOCATION)
+ return;
Is this still possible?
+ if (TREE_CODE (type) == TYPE_DECL)
+ type = TREE_TYPE (type);
+
+ /* If the return type is void there is no ambiguity. */
+ if (same_type_p (type, void_type_node))
+ return;
+
+ auto_diagnostic_group d;
+ tree params = declarator->u.function.parameters;
+ const bool has_list_ctor_p = CLASS_TYPE_P (type) && TYPE_HAS_LIST_CTOR
(type);
+
+ /* The T t() case. */
+ if (params == void_list_node)
+ {
+ if (warning_at (loc, OPT_Wvexing_parse,
+ "empty parentheses were disambiguated as a function "
+ "declaration"))
+ {
+ /* () means value-initialization (C++03 and up); {} (C++11 and up)
+ means value-initialization or aggregate--initialization, nothing
+ means default-initialization. We can only suggest removing the
+ parentheses/adding {} if T has a default constructor. */
+ if (!CLASS_TYPE_P (type) || TYPE_HAS_DEFAULT_CONSTRUCTOR (type))
+ {
+ gcc_rich_location iloc (loc);
+ iloc.add_fixit_remove ();
+ inform (&iloc, "remove parentheses to default-initialize "
+ "a variable");
+ if (cxx_dialect >= cxx11 && !has_list_ctor_p)
+ {
+ if (CP_AGGREGATE_TYPE_P (type))
+ inform (loc, "or replace parentheses with braces to "
+ "aggregate-initialize a variable");
+ else
+ inform (loc, "or replace parentheses with braces to "
+ "value-initialize a variable");
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ return;
+ }
+
+ /* If we had (...) or the parameter-list wasn't parenthesized,
+ we're done. */
+ if (params == NULL_TREE || !PARENTHESIZED_LIST_P (params))
+ return;
This needs to be a loop so we check all the elements of the list.
+ /* The T t(X()) case. */
+ if (list_length (params) == 2)
+ {
+ if (warning_at (loc, OPT_Wvexing_parse,
+ "parentheses were disambiguated as a function "
+ "declaration"))
+ {
+ gcc_rich_location iloc (loc);
+ /* {}-initialization means that we can use an initializer-list
+ constructor if no default constructor is available, so don't
+ suggest using {} for classes that have an initializer_list
+ constructor. */
+ if (cxx_dialect >= cxx11 && !has_list_ctor_p)
+ {
+ iloc.add_fixit_replace (get_start (loc), "{");
+ iloc.add_fixit_replace (get_finish (loc), "}");
+ inform (&iloc, "replace parentheses with braces to declare a "
+ "variable");
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ iloc.add_fixit_insert_after (get_start (loc), "(");
+ iloc.add_fixit_insert_before (get_finish (loc), ")");
+ inform (&iloc, "add parentheses to declare a variable");
> + }
+ }
+ }
+ /* The T t(X(), X()) case. */
+ else
+ warning_at (loc, OPT_Wvexing_parse,
+ "parentheses were disambiguated as a function "
+ "declaration");
+}
Why not suggest braces for this case?
+
/* Declarators [gram.dcl.decl] */
/* Parse an init-declarator.
@@ -20807,6 +20917,13 @@ cp_parser_init_declarator (cp_parser* parser,
}
}
+ if (decl_specifiers->storage_class == sc_none
+ && at_function_scope_p ()
+ && !member_p
+ && !decl_spec_seq_has_spec_p (decl_specifiers, ds_typedef)
+ && !cp_parser_error_occurred (parser))
+ warn_about_ambiguous_parse (decl_specifiers->type, declarator);
Maybe pass decl_specifiers into warn_about_ambiguous_parse and move the
specifiers checks into the function?
/* Check to see if the token indicates the start of a
function-definition. */
if (cp_parser_token_starts_function_definition_p (token))
@@ -21201,7 +21318,7 @@ cp_parser_declarator (cp_parser* parser,
/* If a ptr-operator was found, then this declarator was not
parenthesized. */
if (parenthesized_p)
- *parenthesized_p = true;
+ *parenthesized_p = false;
/* The dependent declarator is optional if we are parsing an
abstract-declarator. */
if (dcl_kind != CP_PARSER_DECLARATOR_NAMED)
@@ -21348,6 +21465,7 @@ cp_parser_direct_declarator (cp_parser* parser,
cp_parser_parse_tentatively (parser);
/* Consume the `('. */
+ const location_t parens_start = token->location;
matching_parens parens;
parens.consume_open (parser);
if (first)
@@ -21367,6 +21485,8 @@ cp_parser_direct_declarator (cp_parser* parser,
/* Parse the parameter-declaration-clause. */
params
= cp_parser_parameter_declaration_clause (parser, flags);
+ const location_t parens_end
+ = cp_lexer_peek_token (parser->lexer)->location;
/* Consume the `)'. */
parens.require_close (parser);
@@ -21431,6 +21551,9 @@ cp_parser_direct_declarator (cp_parser* parser,
/* Parse the virt-specifier-seq. */
virt_specifiers = cp_parser_virt_specifier_seq_opt (parser);
+ location_t parens_loc = make_location (parens_start,
+ parens_start,
+ parens_end);
/* Create the function-declarator. */
declarator = make_call_declarator (declarator,
params,
@@ -21440,7 +21563,8 @@ cp_parser_direct_declarator (cp_parser* parser,
tx_qual,
exception_specification,
late_return,
- requires_clause);
+ requires_clause,
+ parens_loc);
declarator->std_attributes = attrs;
declarator->attributes = gnu_attrs;
/* Any subsequent parameter lists are to do with
@@ -22707,7 +22831,7 @@ cp_parser_parameter_declaration_clause (cp_parser*
parser,
/* Consume the `void' token. */
cp_lexer_consume_token (parser->lexer);
/* There are no parameters. */
- return void_list_node;
+ return explicit_void_list_node;
}
/* Parse the parameter-declaration-list. */
@@ -22838,7 +22962,13 @@ cp_parser_parameter_declaration_list (cp_parser*
parser, cp_parser_flags flags)
|| cp_lexer_next_token_is (parser->lexer, CPP_SEMICOLON)
|| cp_lexer_next_token_is (parser->lexer, CPP_OPEN_BRACE))
/* The parameter-declaration-list is complete. */
- break;
+ {
+ /* If the parameters were parenthesized, it's the case of
+ T foo(X(x)) which looks like a variable definition but
+ is a function declaration. */
+ PARENTHESIZED_LIST_P (parameters) = parenthesized_p;
+ break;
+ }
else if (cp_lexer_next_token_is (parser->lexer, CPP_COMMA))
{
cp_token *token;
diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
index 79d479c72b7..bab6c2c4454 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
@@ -253,7 +253,8 @@ in the following sections.
-Woverloaded-virtual -Wno-pmf-conversions -Wsign-promo @gol
-Wsized-deallocation -Wsuggest-final-methods @gol
-Wsuggest-final-types -Wsuggest-override @gol
--Wno-terminate -Wuseless-cast -Wvirtual-inheritance @gol
+-Wno-terminate -Wuseless-cast -Wno-vexing-parse @gol
+-Wvirtual-inheritance @gol
-Wno-virtual-move-assign -Wvolatile -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant}
@item Objective-C and Objective-C++ Language Options
@@ -3886,6 +3887,37 @@ use the STL. One may also use using directives and
qualified names.
Disable the warning about a throw-expression that will immediately
result in a call to @code{terminate}.
+@item -Wno-vexing-parse @r{(C++ and Objective-C++ only)}
+@opindex Wvexing-parse
+@opindex Wno-vexing-parse
+Warn about the most vexing parse syntactic ambiguity. This warns about
+the cases when a declaration looks like a variable definition, but the
+C++ language requires it to be interpreted as a function declaration.
+For instance:
+
+@smallexample
+void f(double a) @{
+ int i(); // extern int i (void);
+ int n(int(a)); // extern int n (int);
+@}
+@end smallexample
+
+Another example:
+
+@smallexample
+struct S @{ S(int); @};
+void f(double a) @{
+ S x(int(a)); // extern struct S x (int);
+ S y(int()); // extern struct S y (int (*) (void));
+ S z(); // extern struct S z (void);
+@}
+@end smallexample
+
+The warning will suggest options how to deal with such an ambiguity; e.g.,
+it can suggest removing the parentheses or using braces instead.
+
+This warning is enabled by default.
+
@item -Wno-class-conversion @r{(C++ and Objective-C++ only)}
@opindex Wno-class-conversion
@opindex Wclass-conversion
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/fn-template16.C
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/fn-template16.C
index becaff1e3fb..8ee783ad577 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/fn-template16.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/fn-template16.C
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ struct undeclared<int> { }; // { dg-error "not a class
template" }
int
main ()
{
- int foo ();
+ int foo (); // { dg-warning "empty parentheses" }
int foo (int);
int foo (int, int);
int a, b = 10;
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/fn-template7.C
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/fn-template7.C
index d048606c0d6..2c5ee120dcd 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/fn-template7.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/fn-template7.C
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ struct undeclared<int> { }; // { dg-error "not a class
template" }
int
main ()
{
- int foo ();
+ int foo (); // { dg-warning "empty parentheses" }
int a, b = 10;
a = foo<; // { dg-error "invalid template-argument-list|invalid" }
a = foo < b; // { dg-error "invalid template-argument-list|invalid" }
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/pr80891-5.C
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/pr80891-5.C
index e018922d68b..10d1ce3f3d5 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/pr80891-5.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/pr80891-5.C
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ template <typename, typename, typename, typename,
struct B {
B(A, A, int, int, int, int);
void m_fn1(SubGraphIsoMapCallback p1) {
- __normal_iterator __trans_tmp_1();
+ __normal_iterator __trans_tmp_1(); // { dg-warning "empty parentheses" }
p1(__trans_tmp_1, 0);
}
};
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lto/pr79050_0.C
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lto/pr79050_0.C
index 1f31b5d0020..464f5594769 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lto/pr79050_0.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lto/pr79050_0.C
@@ -3,5 +3,5 @@
int main ()
{
- auto foo ();
+ extern auto foo ();
}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lto/pr84805_0.C
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lto/pr84805_0.C
index 1509eae4845..668ba362aed 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lto/pr84805_0.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lto/pr84805_0.C
@@ -149,5 +149,5 @@ public:
class XclImpRoot : XclRoot {};
class XclImpColRowSettings : XclImpRoot {};
void lcl_ExportExcelBiff() {
-XclRootData aExpData();
+extern XclRootData aExpData();
}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/pr58898.C
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/pr58898.C
index e788c913c66..e67011d2fe7 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/pr58898.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/pr58898.C
@@ -5,12 +5,12 @@ struct Foo
{
Foo()
{
- int t(int()); // Error
+ int t(int()); // { dg-warning "parentheses were disambiguated" }
}
};
int main()
{
- int t(int()); // OK
+ int t(int()); // { dg-warning "parentheses were disambiguated" }
Foo<> a; // Error
}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/scope5.C
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/scope5.C
index cf23a0837bd..b20d897b49f 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/scope5.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/scope5.C
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ template <typename av> struct ac : ao<av> { typedef
c::e<am::an> aq; };
template <typename aw, typename i, typename ax> void ay(aw, i, ax) {
// Not sure if this has been creduced from an initialization of a
// variable to a block-scope extern function decl
- au<c::e<ap<typename ak<i>::o>::f> > az2();
+ au<c::e<ap<typename ak<i>::o>::f> > az2(); // { dg-warning "empty
parentheses" }
}
void v() {
ad a;
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wvexing-parse.C
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wvexing-parse.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..b02e904fa83
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wvexing-parse.C
@@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
+// PR c++/25814
+// { dg-do compile }
+// Test -Wvexing-parse.
+
+struct T { };
+
+struct X {
+ X();
+};
+
+struct S {
+ S(int);
+ S foo (int (int));
+ S(T);
+ int m;
+};
+
+struct W {
+ W();
+ W(X, X);
+ int m;
+};
+
+int g;
+int g1(int(g));
+int g2(int());
+void fg(int);
+
+void
+fn1 (double (a))
+{
+ extern int f0();
+ extern int f1(int(a));
+ int f2(int(a)); // { dg-warning "parentheses were disambiguated as a function
declaration" }
+ int (*f3)(int(a));
+ int f4(int a);
+ int f5(int()); // { dg-warning "parentheses were disambiguated as a function
declaration" }
+ int f6(...);
+ int f7((int(a)));
+ int (f8);
+ int f9(S(s)); // { dg-warning "parentheses were disambiguated as a function
declaration" }
+ int(f10) __attribute__(());
+ int(f11(int()));
+ if (int(a) = 1) { }
+ int j, k, l(); // { dg-warning "empty parentheses were disambiguated as a
function declaration" }
+ int m, f12(int(j)); // { dg-warning "parentheses were disambiguated as a function
declaration" }
+
+ T t1(); // { dg-warning "empty parentheses were disambiguated as a function
declaration" }
+ T t2(T()); // { dg-warning "parentheses were disambiguated as a function
declaration" }
+ /* Declares a variable t3. */
+ T(t3);
+ T t4(), // { dg-warning "empty parentheses were disambiguated as a function
declaration" }
+ t5(); // { dg-warning "empty parentheses were disambiguated as a function
declaration" }
+
+ extern S s1(int(a));
+ S s2(int(a)); // { dg-warning "parentheses were disambiguated as a function
declaration" }
+ S s3(int a);
+ S s4(int()); // { dg-warning "parentheses were disambiguated as a function
declaration" }
+ S s5(int(int)); // { dg-warning "parentheses were disambiguated as a function
declaration" }
+ S s6(...);
+ S s7((int(a)));
+ S s8((int)a);
+ S s9 = int(a);
+ S(T());
+ S s10(S()); // { dg-warning "parentheses were disambiguated as a function
declaration" }
+ S s11(T());
+ S s12(X()); // { dg-warning "parentheses were disambiguated as a function
declaration" }
+ S s13 = S(T());
+ S(T()).foo(0);
+ S (S::*foo)(int (int));
+ S(*s14)(int(a));
+ S s15(); // { dg-warning "empty parentheses were disambiguated as a function
declaration" }
+ S s16(void);
+
+ /* Don't warn here. */
+ void fv1(int(a));
+ void fv2(int());
+ void (fv3)();
+ void (fv4)(void);
+ void (fv5)(int);
+
+ int n(); // { dg-warning "empty parentheses were disambiguated as a function
declaration" }
+ int (n2)(); // { dg-warning "empty parentheses were disambiguated as a function
declaration" }
+ int n3(void);
+
+ typedef int F(const char*);
+ typedef int F2();
+ typedef int F3() const;
+ typedef int F4(int(a)) const;
+
+ W w(X(), X()); // { dg-warning "parentheses were disambiguated as a function
declaration" }
+}
+
+struct C1 {
+ C1(int);
+};
+
+struct C2 {
+ C2(C1, int);
+};
+
+template<int N> int value() { return N; }
+
+void
+fn2 ()
+{
+ int i = 0;
+ C2 c2(C1(int(i)), i);
+ C1(value<0>());
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wvexing-parse2.C
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wvexing-parse2.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..0dbeb7255cc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wvexing-parse2.C
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+// PR c++/25814
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+// Test -Wvexing-parse. C++11 features.
+
+struct X { };
+struct T {
+ T(X);
+};
+
+void
+fn1 (double (a))
+{
+ auto l = [](){
+ int f(int(a)); // { dg-warning "parentheses were disambiguated as a function
declaration" }
+ };
+
+ [[noreturn]] int(e)(); // { dg-warning "empty parentheses were disambiguated as a
function declaration" }
+
+ T t1{X()};
+ T t2(X{});
+ T t3{X{}};
+
+ using U = int();
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wvexing-parse3.C
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wvexing-parse3.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..43fcdf29f61
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wvexing-parse3.C
@@ -0,0 +1,129 @@
+// PR c++/25814
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+// { dg-additional-options "-fdiagnostics-show-caret" }
+// Test -Wvexing-parse's fix-it hints in C++11.
+
+#include <initializer_list>
+
+struct X { };
+
+struct S {
+ S(X);
+ S(std::initializer_list<X>);
+ int m;
+};
+
+struct T {
+ T(X);
+ int m;
+};
+
+struct W {
+ W();
+ W(std::initializer_list<X>);
+ int m;
+};
+
+struct U {
+ U();
+ int m;
+};
+
+int
+main ()
+{
+ /*
+ Careful what we're suggesting:
+ S a((X())) -> S(X)
+ S a({X()}) -> (std::initializer_list<X>)
+ S a{X()} -> (std::initializer_list<X>)
+ */
+ S a(X()); // { dg-warning "6:parentheses were disambiguated as a function
declaration" }
+ /* { dg-begin-multiline-output "" }
+ S a(X());
+ ^~~~~
+ { dg-end-multiline-output "" } */
+ // { dg-message "6:add parentheses to declare a variable" "" { target *-*-*
} 41 }
+ /* { dg-begin-multiline-output "" }
+ S a(X());
+ ^~~~~
+ ( )
+ { dg-end-multiline-output "" } */
+
+ T t(X()); // { dg-warning "6:parentheses were disambiguated as a function
declaration" }
+ /* { dg-begin-multiline-output "" }
+ T t(X());
+ ^~~~~
+ { dg-end-multiline-output "" } */
+ // { dg-message "6:replace parentheses with braces to declare a variable" ""
{ target *-*-* } 53 }
+ /* { dg-begin-multiline-output "" }
+ T t(X());
+ ^~~~~
+ -
+ { -
+ }
+ { dg-end-multiline-output "" } */
+
+ int n( ); // { dg-warning "8:empty parentheses were disambiguated as a function
declaration" }
+ /* { dg-begin-multiline-output "" }
+ int n( );
+ ^~~~~
+ { dg-end-multiline-output "" } */
+ // { dg-message "8:remove parentheses to default-initialize a variable" "" {
target *-*-* } 67 }
+ /* { dg-begin-multiline-output "" }
+ int n( );
+ ^~~~~
+ -----
+ { dg-end-multiline-output "" } */
+ // { dg-message "8:or replace parentheses with braces to value-initialize a variable"
"" { target *-*-* } 67 }
+
+ S s(); // { dg-warning "6:empty parentheses were disambiguated as a function
declaration" }
+ /* { dg-begin-multiline-output "" }
+ S s();
+ ^~
+ { dg-end-multiline-output "" } */
+
+ X x(); // { dg-warning "6:empty parentheses were disambiguated as a function
declaration" }
+ /* { dg-begin-multiline-output "" }
+ X x();
+ ^~
+ { dg-end-multiline-output "" } */
+ // { dg-message "6:remove parentheses to default-initialize a variable" "" {
target *-*-* } 86 }
+ /* { dg-begin-multiline-output "" }
+ X x();
+ ^~
+ --
+ { dg-end-multiline-output "" } */
+ // { dg-message "6:or replace parentheses with braces to aggregate-initialize a
variable" "" { target *-*-* } 86 }
+
+ W w(); // { dg-warning "6:empty parentheses were disambiguated as a function
declaration" }
+ /* { dg-begin-multiline-output "" }
+ W w();
+ ^~
+ { dg-end-multiline-output "" } */
+ // { dg-message "6:remove parentheses to default-initialize a variable" "" {
target *-*-* } 99 }
+ /* { dg-begin-multiline-output "" }
+ W w();
+ ^~
+ --
+ { dg-end-multiline-output "" } */
+
+ T t2(); // { dg-warning "7:empty parentheses were disambiguated as a function
declaration" }
+ /* { dg-begin-multiline-output "" }
+ T t2();
+ ^~
+ { dg-end-multiline-output "" } */
+
+ U u(); // { dg-warning "6:empty parentheses were disambiguated as a function
declaration" }
+ /* { dg-begin-multiline-output "" }
+ U u();
+ ^~
+ { dg-end-multiline-output "" } */
+ // { dg-message "6:remove parentheses to default-initialize a variable" "" {
target *-*-* } 117 }
+ /* { dg-begin-multiline-output "" }
+ U u();
+ ^~
+ --
+ { dg-end-multiline-output "" } */
+ // { dg-message "6:or replace parentheses with braces to value-initialize a variable"
"" { target *-*-* } 117 }
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wvexing-parse4.C
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wvexing-parse4.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..3e010aaba3d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wvexing-parse4.C
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+// PR c++/25814
+// { dg-do compile { target c++98_only } }
+// { dg-additional-options "-fdiagnostics-show-caret" }
+// Test -Wvexing-parse's fix-it hints in C++98.
+
+struct X { };
+
+struct T {
+ T(X);
+ int m;
+};
+
+struct U {
+ U();
+ int m;
+};
+
+int
+main ()
+{
+ T t(X()); // { dg-warning "6:parentheses were disambiguated as a function
declaration" }
+ /* { dg-begin-multiline-output "" }
+ T t(X());
+ ^~~~~
+ { dg-end-multiline-output "" } */
+ // { dg-message "6:add parentheses to declare a variable" "" { target *-*-*
} 21 }
+ /* { dg-begin-multiline-output "" }
+ T t(X());
+ ^~~~~
+ ( )
+ { dg-end-multiline-output "" } */
+
+ int n( ); // { dg-warning "8:empty parentheses were disambiguated as a function
declaration" }
+ /* { dg-begin-multiline-output "" }
+ int n( );
+ ^~~~~
+ { dg-end-multiline-output "" } */
+ // { dg-message "8:remove parentheses to default-initialize a variable" "" {
target *-*-* } 33 }
+ /* { dg-begin-multiline-output "" }
+ int n( );
+ ^~~~~
+ -----
+ { dg-end-multiline-output "" } */
+
+ T y(); // { dg-warning "6:empty parentheses were disambiguated as a function
declaration" }
+ /* { dg-begin-multiline-output "" }
+ T y();
+ ^~
+ { dg-end-multiline-output "" } */
+
+ X x(); // { dg-warning "6:empty parentheses were disambiguated as a function
declaration" }
+ /* { dg-begin-multiline-output "" }
+ X x();
+ ^~
+ { dg-end-multiline-output "" } */
+ // { dg-message "6:remove parentheses to default-initialize a variable" "" {
target *-*-* } 51 }
+ /* { dg-begin-multiline-output "" }
+ X x();
+ ^~
+ --
+ { dg-end-multiline-output "" } */
+
+ U u(); // { dg-warning "6:empty parentheses were disambiguated as a function
declaration" }
+ /* { dg-begin-multiline-output "" }
+ U u();
+ ^~
+ { dg-end-multiline-output "" } */
+ // { dg-message "6:remove parentheses to default-initialize a variable" "" {
target *-*-* } 63 }
+ /* { dg-begin-multiline-output "" }
+ U u();
+ ^~
+ --
+ { dg-end-multiline-output "" } */
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wvexing-parse5.C
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wvexing-parse5.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..3422e706160
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wvexing-parse5.C
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+// PR c++/25814
+// { dg-do compile }
+// Test -Wvexing-parse in a template.
+
+struct X { };
+
+template<typename T>
+void fn ()
+{
+ T t(); // { dg-warning "empty parentheses were disambiguated as a function
declaration" }
+ T a(X()); // { dg-warning "parentheses were disambiguated as a function
declaration" }
+ X x(T()); // { dg-warning "parentheses were disambiguated as a function
declaration" }
+ int i(T()); // { dg-warning "parentheses were disambiguated as a function
declaration" }
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wvexing-parse6.C
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wvexing-parse6.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..58fa725a2ee
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wvexing-parse6.C
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+// PR c++/25814
+// { dg-do compile }
+// Test from Wikipedia.
+
+class Timer {
+ public:
+ Timer();
+};
+
+class TimeKeeper {
+ public:
+ TimeKeeper(const Timer& t);
+
+ int get_time();
+};
+
+void f(double adouble) {
+ int i(int(adouble)); // { dg-warning "parentheses were disambiguated as a
function declaration" }
+}
+
+int main() {
+ TimeKeeper time_keeper(Timer()); // { dg-warning "parentheses were disambiguated
as a function declaration" }
+ return time_keeper.get_time(); // { dg-error "request for member" }
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.brendan/recurse.C
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.brendan/recurse.C
index de20a073221..0af1c147cd8 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.brendan/recurse.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.brendan/recurse.C
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ public:
int main()
{
- DBpathrec a(), b();
+ DBpathrec a(), b(); // { dg-warning "empty parentheses" }
a = b;// { dg-error "" } non-lvalue in assignment.*
}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.jason/template4.C
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.jason/template4.C
index de7d3312a71..1cf5a614411 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.jason/template4.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.jason/template4.C
@@ -17,5 +17,5 @@ template <class T>
ccList <T> cc_List<T>::copy (){}
int main (int, char **) {
- ccList <int> size1();
+ ccList <int> size1(); // { dg-warning "empty parentheses" }
}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.law/arm4.C
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.law/arm4.C
index bbcf7df2391..59492ca952c 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.law/arm4.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.law/arm4.C
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ int main(void)
{
double a = 2.0;
- S x(int (a));
+ S x(int (a)); // { dg-warning "parentheses were disambiguated" }
if (count > 0)
{ printf ("FAIL\n"); return 1; }
else
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.mike/for2.C
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.mike/for2.C
index 6eb5d66675e..4a7c3042544 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.mike/for2.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.mike/for2.C
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ void bar() {
void bee () {
int i = 0;
- for (int fun() = 0; i != 2; ++i) { // { dg-warning "extern" "extern" }
+ for (int fun() = 0; i != 2; ++i) { // { dg-warning "extern|empty parentheses"
"extern" }
// { dg-error "initialized" "init" { target *-*-* } .-1 }
}
}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.other/local4.C
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.other/local4.C
index b5514a54b46..492ce2b7e70 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.other/local4.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.other/local4.C
@@ -6,6 +6,6 @@ int f (int);
int main ()
{
- int f ();
+ int f (); // { dg-warning "empty parentheses" }
return f ();
}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.pt/crash3.C
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.pt/crash3.C
index 52701b776ef..d1d9b12738c 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.pt/crash3.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.pt/crash3.C
@@ -7,11 +7,13 @@ public:
{
// local-extern :)
CVector<int> v(); // { dg-message "old declaration" }
+ // { dg-warning "empty parentheses" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 }
return v; // { dg-error "convert" }
}
CVector<long> g() const
{
CVector<long> v(); // { dg-error "ambiguating new" }
+ // { dg-warning "empty parentheses" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 }
return v; // { dg-error "convert" }
}
};
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/reference_wrapper/lwg2993.cc
b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/reference_wrapper/lwg2993.cc
index d1f0cafe688..c30511cab11 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/reference_wrapper/lwg2993.cc
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/reference_wrapper/lwg2993.cc
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ test01()
void
test02()
{
- std::reference_wrapper<int> purr();
+ std::reference_wrapper<int> purr(); // { dg-warning "empty parentheses" }
// error, ambiguous: ICS exists from int prvalue to
// reference_wrapper<int> and from reference_wrapper<int> to int
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/25_algorithms/generate_n/87982_neg.cc
b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/25_algorithms/generate_n/87982_neg.cc
index 4236b5a820d..73934638ee3 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/25_algorithms/generate_n/87982_neg.cc
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/25_algorithms/generate_n/87982_neg.cc
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
void test01()
{
- int gen();
+ int gen(); // { dg-warning "empty parentheses" }
int a[2];
std::generate_n(a, a+2, &gen);
}
base-commit: ffe6b4101501b5ada6f09a1fdf3822a23b68b5aa
