On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 09:38:20AM -0500, will schmidt wrote: > > @@ -2420,6 +2423,8 @@ BU_P9V_64BIT_VSX_2 (VSIEDPF, "scalar_insert_exp_dp", > > CONST, xsiexpdpf) > > > > BU_FLOAT128_HW_VSX_2 (VSIEQP, "scalar_insert_exp_q", CONST, > > xsiexpqp_kf) > > BU_FLOAT128_HW_VSX_2 (VSIEQPF, "scalar_insert_exp_qp", CONST, > > xsiexpqpf_kf) > > +BU_FLOAT128_HW_VSX_2 (VSIETF, "scalar_insert_exp_tf", CONST, > > xsiexpqp_tf) > > +BU_FLOAT128_HW_VSX_2 (VSIETFF, "scalar_insert_exp_tfp", CONST, > > xsiexpqpf_tf) > > Ok if its ok, but the pattern catches my eye. Should that be VSIETFP ? > (or named "scalar_insert_exp_tff")?
That is the existing function in the library. All I'm doing is adding TF versions of the existing functions. -- Michael Meissner, IBM IBM, M/S 2506R, 550 King Street, Littleton, MA 01460-6245, USA email: meiss...@linux.ibm.com, phone: +1 (978) 899-4797
