On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 3:29 PM Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 03:20:55PM +0100, Aldy Hernandez wrote: > > > g++.dg/opt/, g++.dg/ itself shouldn't really have any tests directly. > > > > Wait, what? I've always put them into g++.dg. And it looks like that > > Many people violate that.
Guilty as charged! > > > directory is chock-full of PRxxxx.C files. When did we change to > > opt/? How about gcc.dg? I don't see an opt/ directory there. > > gcc.dg/ doesn't use subdirectories in general (unless one needs different > testsuite drivers), while g++.dg historically has been using topic > subdirectories. > The loads of tests are different, gcc.dg/ has directly in it more than 5000 > tests, while g++.dg less than 300, while over 12000 tests in subdirectories. I will adjust my renegade behavior from now on :) Aldy
