On Fri, 23 Oct 2020, Xiong Hu Luo wrote:
> Sometimes debug_bb_slim&debug_bb_n_slim is not enough, how about adding
> this debug_bb_details&debug_bb_n_details? Or any other similar call
> existed?
There's already debug_bb and debug_bb_n in cfg.c which works on both
RTL and GIMPLE. How about instead adding overloads that accept
a flags argument so you can do
debug_bb_n (5, TDF_DETAILS)
? The debug_bb_slim variant would then just a forwarder.
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> 2020-10-23 Xionghu Luo <luo...@linux.ibm.com>
>
> * print-rtl.c (debug_bb_details): New function.
> * (debug_bb_n_details): New function.
> ---
> gcc/print-rtl.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/print-rtl.c b/gcc/print-rtl.c
> index 25265efc71b..f45873b8863 100644
> --- a/gcc/print-rtl.c
> +++ b/gcc/print-rtl.c
> @@ -2150,6 +2150,21 @@ debug_bb_n_slim (int n)
> debug_bb_slim (bb);
> }
>
> +extern void debug_bb_details (basic_block);
> +DEBUG_FUNCTION void
> +debug_bb_details (basic_block bb)
> +{
> + dump_bb (stderr, bb, 0, TDF_DETAILS | TDF_BLOCKS);
> +}
> +
> +extern void debug_bb_n_details (int);
> +DEBUG_FUNCTION void
> +debug_bb_n_details (int n)
> +{
> + basic_block bb = BASIC_BLOCK_FOR_FN (cfun, n);
> + debug_bb_details (bb);
> +}
> +
> #endif
>
> #if __GNUC__ >= 10
>
--
Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de>
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstrasse 5, 90409 Nuernberg,
Germany; GF: Felix Imend
