On Fri, 16 Oct 2020 at 13:02, Jonathan Wakely <jwak...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On 16/10/20 10:26 +0300, Ville Voutilainen via Libstdc++ wrote: > >Tested on Linux-PPC64. I haven't tested this with clang yet, > >Jonathan, can you help with that? The previous implementation > >indeed made an if-constexpr branch invalid for all instantiations > >of that branch, this one doesn't - now we have just a dependent static_assert > >which is well-formed for correct visitors and ill-formed for incorrect > >visitors. > > All I checked is that <variant> can now be included using -std=c++17, > but that works with Clang. > > OK for trunk, thanks.
The subject line is wrong, this is 97449, not 97499. Fixing that and pushing.
