Re: [r11-3641 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pta-ptrarith-1.c -Os scan-tree-dump alias "ESCAPED = {[^\n}]* i f [^\n}]*}" on Linux/x86_64 (-m32 -march=cascadelake)

[H.J. Lu via Gcc-patches]

On Sat, Oct 3, 2020 at 5:57 PM Segher Boessenkool
<seg...@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 03, 2020 at 12:21:04PM -0700, sunil.k.pandey via Gcc-patches 
> wrote:
> > On Linux/x86_64,
> >
> > c34db4b6f8a5d80367c709309f9b00cb32630054 is the first bad commit
> > commit c34db4b6f8a5d80367c709309f9b00cb32630054
> > Author: Jan Hubicka <j...@suse.cz>
> > Date:   Sat Oct 3 17:20:16 2020 +0200
> >
> >     Track access ranges in ipa-modref
> >
> > caused
>
> [ ... ]
>
> This isn't a patch.  Wrong mailing list?

I view this as a follow up of

https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-October/555314.html

What do people think about this kind of followups?  Is this appropriate
for this mailing list?

-- 
H.J.