On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 8:33 AM, Jason Merrill <ja...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Sometimes an expression that is non-constant at one point in the translation
> unit can become constant later, when a constexpr function is defined.  So
> let's not cache failure.
>
> Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applying to trunk.  This isn't a regression, but
> as before, since C++11 support is still experimental I consider patches that
> fix C++11 bugs and don't affect C++98 code to be acceptable.

Thanks!
with hindsight, it is "obvious" :-)

-- Gaby

Reply via email to