On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 00:33, Tobias Burnus <bur...@net-b.de> wrote: > Dear Janne, > > >> - The integer values for the signal numbers are not standardized, >> hence printing them might give the user a false impression that these >> numbers convey some information beyond whichever SIG* macro they map >> to on that particular target. >> >> - It doesn't test all the signals which are actually handled, see >> compile_options.c:set_options(). Also, as a minor point, there's no >> need to have #ifdef tests for the C89 signals, again see >> set_options(). > > > How about the attached version? The description is based on IEEE Std > 1003.1:2003, though I additionally left "segmentation fault" and > "floating-point exception" as those names are presumably better known that > the long description and as SIGSEGV/SIGFPE. "Bus error" is also somewhat > known, but SIGBUS should be sufficient.
Ok, thanks! -- Janne Blomqvist
