Hi Georg. I have found that conversion AVR port to using hard_frame_pointer have resolved PR 50925 . I have tested the patch without regressions, but I'm worry about it. Can you test it with your testsuite for regressions ? May be you have your own special difficult tests (special for addressing) ?
2012-01-09 Richard Henderson <r...@redhat.com>
Denis Chertykov <cherty...@gmail.com>
PR target/50925
* config/avr/avr-protos.h (avr_hard_regno_nregs): Declare.
* config/avr/avr.c (avr_can_eliminate): Simplify.
(avr_initial_elimination_offset): Likewise.
(avr_prologue_setup_frame): Use hard_frame_pointer_rtx.
(expand_epilogue): Likewise.
(avr_legitimize_address): Gut.
(avr_legitimize_reload_address): Use hard_frame_pointer_rtx.
(avr_hard_regno_nregs): New.
(avr_hard_regno_ok): Allow only Pmode for arg and frame_pointers.
(avr_regno_mode_code_ok_for_base_b): Handle arg and frame pointers.
* config/avr/avr.h (FIXED_REGISTERS): Adjust arg pointer,
add soft frame pointer.
(CALL_USED_REGISTERS): Likewise.
(REG_CLASS_CONTENTS): Likewise.
(REGISTER_NAMES): Likewise.
(HARD_REGNO_NREGS): Use avr_hard_regno_nregs.
(HARD_FRAME_POINTER_REGNUM): New.
(FRAME_POINTER_REGNUM): Use soft frame pointer.
(ELIMINABLE_REGS): Eliminate from the soft frame pointer,
remove the HARD_FRAME_POINTER self-elimination.
Denis.
avr-sfp-patch
Description: Binary data
