Andrea Corallo <andrea.cora...@arm.com> writes: > Andrea Corallo <andrea.cora...@arm.com> writes: > >> Hi Alex, >> >> Looking at the code I believe all these casts are meant to be supported >> (read your intuition was correct). >> >> Also IMO source of confusion is that the doc is mentioning 'int' and >> 'float' but I believe would be better to have like 'integral' and >> 'floating-point' to clearly disambiguates with respect to the C >> types. >> >> AFAIU the set of supported casts should be like: >> >> integral <-> integral >> floating-point <-> floating-point >> integral <-> floating-point >> integral <-> bool >> P* <-> Q* for pointer types P and Q. >> >> I'd propose to install the following patch to make doc and comments >> homogeneous at documenting what do we accept, and I guess we should just >> consider bugs if some of these conversions is not handled correctly or >> leads to ICE. >> >> Bests >> >> Andrea >> >> gcc/jit/ChangeLog >> >> 2020-07-21 Andrea Corallo <andrea.cora...@arm.com> >> >> * docs/_build/texinfo/libgccjit.texi (Type-coercion): Improve doc >> on allowed type casting. >> * docs/topics/expressions.rst (gccjit::context::new_cast) >> (gcc_jit_context_new_cast): Likewise. >> * libgccjit.c: Improve comment on allowed type casting. >> * libgccjit.h: Likewise >> >> From 914b9e86808c947d4bb2b06c6960fd8031125f67 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Andrea Corallo <andrea.cora...@arm.com> >> Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 20:12:23 +0200 >> Subject: [PATCH] libgccjit: improve documentation on type conversions
[...] > Ping > > Thanks > Andrea Ping
