Re: *Ping*: [PATCH] PR fortran/96711 - ICE on NINT() Function

[Harald Anlauf]

Hi Thomas,

thanks for the review!

> Regarding the patch: Could you change the test caes into a
> run-time test and check for the results both for compile-time
> simplification and evaluation at run-time?  Just to make sure that
> fold_convert wasn't trying to tell us something that convert doesn't...
>
> OK with that change.

Here's the test I committed:


! { dg-do run }
! { dg-require-effective-target fortran_integer_16 }
! { dg-require-effective-target fortran_real_16 }
! { dg-additional-options "-fdump-tree-original" }
! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "_gfortran_stop_numeric" 2 "original" } }
!
! PR fortran/96711 - ICE on NINT() Function

program p
  implicit none
  real(8)                :: x
  real(16)               :: y
  integer(16), parameter :: k1 = nint (2 / epsilon (x), kind(k1))
  integer(16), parameter :: k2 = nint (2 / epsilon (y), kind(k2))
  integer(16), parameter :: m1 = 9007199254740992_16                    !2**53
  integer(16), parameter :: m2 = 10384593717069655257060992658440192_16 !2**113
  integer(16), volatile  :: m
  x = 2 / epsilon (x)
  y = 2 / epsilon (y)
  m = nint (x, kind(m))
! print *, m
  if (k1 /= m1) stop 1
  if (m  /= m1) stop 2
  m = nint (y, kind(m))
! print *, m
  if (k2 /= m2) stop 3
  if (m  /= m2) stop 4
end program


Harald