>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Stubbs <a...@codesourcery.com> writes:
Andrew> To be fair, the DWARF standard makes a similar assumption; the Andrew> engineers working on LLVM and GDB, at AMD, have therefore invented Andrew> some new DWARF operators that they plan to propose for a future Andrew> standard. Only one is relevant here, however: Andrew> DW_OP_LLVM_piece_end. (Unfortunately this clashes with an AArch64 Andrew> extension, but I think we can cope using an alias -- only GCC dumps Andrew> will be confusing.) Andrew> +/* AMD GCN extensions (originally for LLVM). */ Andrew> +// This clashes with DW_OP_AARCH64_operation, so use an alias instead Andrew> +// DW_OP (DW_OP_LLVM_piece_end, 0xea) Andrew> +#define DW_OP_LLVM_piece_end DW_OP_AARCH64_operation Andrew> DW_END_OP Is it too late to pick a non-clashing value? Also, we have tried pretty hard in recent years to document all of gcc's DWARF extensions. Please add a link to the documentation for this one. If there aren't docs -- I guess it would be ideal if you could write them. Putting them on the GCC wiki is fine. Tom
