Hi,
this patch fixes first half of the PR.  The PR is about a function that is 
supposed
to be inlined at -O2.  The function contains two calls, one indirect and 
inlining
the indirect call makes things a lot better. GCC however things that replacing 
call
by two calls at -O2 is a bad idea.

This patch solves first part of it.  The function in question is COMDAT. We 
already
know that C++ coding style makes COMDATs quite rarely to be shared and at -Os we
already handle them sort of similarly to static ufnctions.  We however don't do 
that
at -O2.  This patch makes it happen in both cases.

Bootstrapped/regtested x86_64-linux, comitted.
Will commit the testcase with the followup fix.

        PR tree-optimization/51680
        * ipa-inline.c (want_inline_small_function_p): Be more lax on functions
        whose inlining reduce unit size.

Index: ipa-inline.c
===================================================================
--- ipa-inline.c        (revision 182949)
+++ ipa-inline.c        (working copy)
@@ -482,21 +482,13 @@ want_inline_small_function_p (struct cgr
           e->inline_failed = CIF_MAX_INLINE_INSNS_SINGLE_LIMIT;
          want_inline = false;
        }
-      else if (!DECL_DECLARED_INLINE_P (callee->decl)
-              && !flag_inline_functions)
-       {
-          e->inline_failed = CIF_NOT_DECLARED_INLINED;
-         want_inline = false;
-       }
-      else if (!DECL_DECLARED_INLINE_P (callee->decl)
-              && growth >= MAX_INLINE_INSNS_AUTO)
-       {
-          e->inline_failed = CIF_MAX_INLINE_INSNS_AUTO_LIMIT;
-         want_inline = false;
-       }
-      /* If call is cold, do not inline when function body would grow.
-        Still inline when the overall unit size will shrink because the offline
-        copy of function being eliminated.
+      /* Before giving up based on fact that caller size will grow, allow
+         functions that are called few times and eliminating the offline
+        copy will lead to overall code size reduction.
+        Not all of these will be handled by subsequent inlining of functions
+        called once: in particular weak functions are not handled or funcitons
+        that inline to multiple calls but a lot of bodies is optimized out.
+        Finally we want to inline earlier to allow inlining of callbacks.
 
         This is slightly wrong on aggressive side:  it is entirely possible
         that function is called many times with a context where inlining
@@ -509,24 +501,39 @@ want_inline_small_function_p (struct cgr
         first, this situation is not a problem at all: after inlining all
         "good" calls, we will realize that keeping the function around is
         better.  */
-      else if (!cgraph_maybe_hot_edge_p (e)
-              && (DECL_EXTERNAL (callee->decl)
+      else if (growth <= MAX_INLINE_INSNS_SINGLE
+              /* Unlike for functions called once, we play unsafe with
+                 COMDATs.  We can allow that since we know functions
+                 in consideration are small (and thus risk is small) and
+                 moreover grow estimates already accounts that COMDAT
+                 functions may or may not disappear when eliminated from
+                 current unit. With good probability making aggressive
+                 choice in all units is going to make overall program
+                 smaller.
+
+                 Consequently we ask cgraph_can_remove_if_no_direct_calls_p
+                 instead of
+                 cgraph_will_be_removed_from_program_if_no_direct_calls  */
+               && !DECL_EXTERNAL (callee->decl)
+               && cgraph_can_remove_if_no_direct_calls_p (callee)
+               && estimate_growth (callee) <= 0)
+       ;
+      else if (!DECL_DECLARED_INLINE_P (callee->decl)
+              && !flag_inline_functions)
+       {
+          e->inline_failed = CIF_NOT_DECLARED_INLINED;
+         want_inline = false;
+       }
+      else if (!DECL_DECLARED_INLINE_P (callee->decl)
+              && growth >= MAX_INLINE_INSNS_AUTO)
+       {
+          e->inline_failed = CIF_MAX_INLINE_INSNS_AUTO_LIMIT;
+         want_inline = false;
+       }
+      /* If call is cold, do not inline when function body would grow. */
+      else if (!cgraph_maybe_hot_edge_p (e))
 
-                  /* Unlike for functions called once, we play unsafe with
-                     COMDATs.  We can allow that since we know functions
-                     in consideration are small (and thus risk is small) and
-                     moreover grow estimates already accounts that COMDAT
-                     functions may or may not disappear when eliminated from
-                     current unit. With good probability making aggressive
-                     choice in all units is going to make overall program
-                     smaller.
-
-                     Consequently we ask cgraph_can_remove_if_no_direct_calls_p
-                     instead of
-                     cgraph_will_be_removed_from_program_if_no_direct_calls  */
 
-                  || !cgraph_can_remove_if_no_direct_calls_p (callee)
-                  || estimate_growth (callee) > 0))
        {
           e->inline_failed = CIF_UNLIKELY_CALL;
          want_inline = false;

Reply via email to