Re: [patch] multi-range implementation for value_range (irange)

[Martin Liška]

On 8/5/20 4:27 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:

Hi Aldy,
On Fri, 31 Jul 2020, Aldy Hernandez via Gcc-patches wrote:

Jeff approved this patch off-list.  I will re-run tests once again and
commit by Monday.

I believe this has broken the bootstrap with clang (specifically
FreeBSD clang version 10.0.0):

In file included from /scratch/tmp/gerald/GCC-HEAD/gcc/c/gimple-parser.c:44:
In file included from /scratch/tmp/gerald/GCC-HEAD/gcc/tree-vrp.h:23:
/scratch/tmp/gerald/GCC-HEAD/gcc/value-range.h:347:1: error: static declaration of 
'gt_ggc_mx' follows non-static declaration gt_ggc_mx (int_range<N> *x)
/scratch/tmp/gerald/GCC-HEAD/gcc/value-range.h:150:37: note: previous 
declaration is here
   template <unsigned X> friend void gt_ggc_mx (int_range<X> *);
                                     ^

/scratch/tmp/gerald/GCC-HEAD/gcc/value-range.h:358:1: error: static declaration of 
'gt_pch_nx' follows non-static declaration gt_pch_nx (int_range<N> *x)
/scratch/tmp/gerald/GCC-HEAD/gcc/value-range.h:151:37: note: previous 
declaration is here
   template <unsigned X> friend void gt_pch_nx (int_range<X> *);
                                     ^

My daily tester started to 20200803T1640, so the root cause of this must
have entered GCC trunk between Sunday 16:40 UTC and Monday 16:40 UTC.

Gerald

Hey.

This one is still broken. Can you please Aldy take a look?
It's good that GCC code base can be compiled with clang ;)

Martin