On Thu, 6 Aug 2020, Christophe Lyon wrote:

On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 at 11:06, Marc Glisse <marc.gli...@inria.fr> wrote:

On Thu, 6 Aug 2020, Christophe Lyon wrote:

2020-08-05  Marc Glisse  <marc.gli...@inria.fr>

        PR tree-optimization/95906
        PR target/70314
        * match.pd ((c ? a : b) op d, (c ? a : b) op (c ? d : e),
        (v ? w : 0) ? a : b, c1 ? c2 ? a : b : b): New transformations.
        (op (c ? a : b)): Update to match the new transformations.

        * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/andnot-2.c: New file.
        * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr95906.c: Likewise.
        * gcc.target/i386/pr70314.c: Likewise.


I think this patch is causing several ICEs on arm-none-linux-gnueabihf
--with-cpu cortex-a9 --with-fpu neon-fp16:
 Executed from: gcc.c-torture/compile/compile.exp
   gcc.c-torture/compile/20160205-1.c   -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
-funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions  (internal
compiler error)
   gcc.c-torture/compile/20160205-1.c   -O3 -g  (internal compiler error)
 Executed from: gcc.dg/dg.exp
   gcc.dg/pr87746.c (internal compiler error)
 Executed from: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/tree-ssa.exp
   gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ifc-cd.c (internal compiler error)

I tried a cross from x86_64-linux with current master

.../configure --target=arm-none-linux-gnueabihf --enable-languages=c,c++ 
--with-system-zlib --disable-nls --with-cpu=cortex-a9 --with-fpu=neon-fp16
make

it stops at some point with an error, but I have xgcc and cc1 in
build/gcc.

I copied 2 of the testcases and compiled

./xgcc pr87746.c -Ofast -S -B.
./xgcc -O3 -fdump-tree-ifcvt-details-blocks-details ifc-cd.c -S -B.

without getting any ICE.

Sorry for the delay, I had to reproduce the problem manually.

Is there a machine on the compile farm where this is easy to reproduce?
I don't think there is any arm machine in the compile farm.

Or could you attach the .optimized dump that corresponds to the
backtrace below? It looks like we end up with a comparison with an
unexpected return type.


I've compiled pr87746.c with -fdump-tree-ifcvt-details-blocks-details,
here is the log.
Is that what you need?

Thanks.
The one from -fdump-tree-optimized would be closer to the ICE.
Though it would also be convenient to know which stmt is being expanded when we ICE, etc.

Was I on the right track configuring with --target=arm-none-linux-gnueabihf --with-cpu=cortex-a9 --with-fpu=neon-fp16
then compiling without any special option?

Thanks,

Christophe

 Executed from: gcc.dg/vect/vect.exp
   gcc.dg/vect/pr59591-1.c (internal compiler error)
   gcc.dg/vect/pr59591-1.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (internal compiler error)
   gcc.dg/vect/pr86927.c (internal compiler error)
   gcc.dg/vect/pr86927.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (internal compiler error)
   gcc.dg/vect/slp-cond-5.c (internal compiler error)
   gcc.dg/vect/slp-cond-5.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (internal compiler error)
   gcc.dg/vect/vect-23.c (internal compiler error)
   gcc.dg/vect/vect-23.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (internal compiler error)
   gcc.dg/vect/vect-24.c (internal compiler error)
   gcc.dg/vect/vect-24.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (internal compiler error)
   gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-reduc-6.c (internal compiler error)
   gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-reduc-6.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (internal
compiler error)

Backtrace for gcc.c-torture/compile/20160205-1.c   -O3
-fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer
-finline-functions
during RTL pass: expand
/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/20160205-1.c:2:5: internal
compiler error: in do_store_flag, at expr.c:12259
0x8feb26 do_store_flag
       /gcc/expr.c:12259
0x900201 expand_expr_real_2(separate_ops*, rtx_def*, machine_mode,
expand_modifier)
       /gcc/expr.c:9617
0x908cd0 expand_expr_real_1(tree_node*, rtx_def*, machine_mode,
expand_modifier, rtx_def**, bool)
       /gcc/expr.c:10159
0x91174e expand_expr
       /gcc/expr.h:282
0x91174e expand_operands(tree_node*, tree_node*, rtx_def*, rtx_def**,
rtx_def**, expand_modifier)
       /gcc/expr.c:8065
0x8ff543 expand_expr_real_2(separate_ops*, rtx_def*, machine_mode,
expand_modifier)
       /gcc/expr.c:9950
0x908cd0 expand_expr_real_1(tree_node*, rtx_def*, machine_mode,
expand_modifier, rtx_def**, bool)
       /gcc/expr.c:10159
0x91174e expand_expr
       /gcc/expr.h:282
0x91174e expand_operands(tree_node*, tree_node*, rtx_def*, rtx_def**,
rtx_def**, expand_modifier)
       /gcc/expr.c:8065
0x8ff543 expand_expr_real_2(separate_ops*, rtx_def*, machine_mode,
expand_modifier)
       /gcc/expr.c:9950
0x908cd0 expand_expr_real_1(tree_node*, rtx_def*, machine_mode,
expand_modifier, rtx_def**, bool)
       /gcc/expr.c:10159
0x91174e expand_expr
       /gcc/expr.h:282
0x91174e expand_operands(tree_node*, tree_node*, rtx_def*, rtx_def**,
rtx_def**, expand_modifier)
       /gcc/expr.c:8065
0x8ff543 expand_expr_real_2(separate_ops*, rtx_def*, machine_mode,
expand_modifier)
       /gcc/expr.c:9950
0x908cd0 expand_expr_real_1(tree_node*, rtx_def*, machine_mode,
expand_modifier, rtx_def**, bool)
       /gcc/expr.c:10159
0x91174e expand_expr
       /gcc/expr.h:282
0x91174e expand_operands(tree_node*, tree_node*, rtx_def*, rtx_def**,
rtx_def**, expand_modifier)
       /gcc/expr.c:8065
0x8ff543 expand_expr_real_2(separate_ops*, rtx_def*, machine_mode,
expand_modifier)
       /gcc/expr.c:9950
0x908cd0 expand_expr_real_1(tree_node*, rtx_def*, machine_mode,
expand_modifier, rtx_def**, bool)
       /gcc/expr.c:10159
0x91174e expand_expr
       /gcc/expr.h:282

Christophe

--
Marc Glisse


--
Marc Glisse

Reply via email to