I must say that I was thinking rather more of the INTENT(IN) case to make sure that it is accepted.
Paul On Wed, 5 Aug 2020 at 17:41, Thomas Koenig <tkoe...@netcologne.de> wrote: > Hi Paul, > > > This is OK by me. > > Committed (or should I say "pushed"?), thanks! > > > Is it worth testing the INTENT variants? > > I added a test for INTENT(INOUT), here's the version of the > test case that was committed. > > Best regards > > Thomas > -- "If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough" - Albert Einstein
