On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 03:53:50PM -0700, Mike Stump wrote: > On Aug 4, 2020, at 3:16 PM, Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches > <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > > > > The benefit of dg-accepts-invalid was that you would > > get an XPASS even for a test that should not be accepted, but you didn't > > know > > what line to expect an error on, so you put a dg-error at the end of the > > test. > > I think for most cases it's easy enough to figure out where the error goes. > I do see the subtly of the dg-accepts-invalid directive now in the harder > cases. A change of state of them by the new error message I'd like to think > is enough to get the people to look at the test case and the corresponding > bug report. I'd propose seeing if people don't also push along the bug in > that sort of complex case, I think they will.
You're probably right. Let's go ahead without dg-accepts-invalid for now and perhaps reconsider later. Marek
