On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 1:14 PM Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
<gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
> On 7/22/20 2:23 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
> > Hi Martin,
> >
> >> I have committed this change in r11-2231 after Jeff approved it
> >> off list last Thursday.
> >
> > the new gcc.target/i386/memcpy-pr95886.c test FAILs on 32-bit x86
> > (i386-pc-solaris2.11):
> >
> > +FAIL: gcc.target/i386/memcpy-pr95886.c scan-rtl-dump-times expand 
> > "const_int 1976943448883713" 1
> > +FAIL: gcc.target/i386/memcpy-pr95886.c scan-rtl-dump-times expand 
> > "const_int 576467370915332609" 1
> > +FAIL: gcc.target/i386/memcpy-pr95886.c scan-rtl-dump-times expand 
> > "const_int 578431098682540545" 1
> > +FAIL: gcc.target/i386/memcpy-pr95886.c scan-rtl-dump-times expand 
> > "const_int 578437695685198337" 1
> > +FAIL: gcc.target/i386/memcpy-pr95886.c scan-rtl-dump-times expand 
> > "const_int 578437695685198337" 1
> > +FAIL: gcc.target/i386/memcpy-pr95886.c scan-rtl-dump-times expand 
> > "const_int 578437695752110593" 1
> > +FAIL: gcc.target/i386/memcpy-pr95886.c scan-rtl-dump-times expand 
> > "const_int 578437695752306689" 1
> > +FAIL: gcc.target/i386/memcpy-pr95886.c scan-rtl-dump-times expand 
> > "const_int 578437695752307200" 1
> > +FAIL: gcc.target/i386/memcpy-pr95886.c scan-rtl-dump-times expand 
> > "const_int 578437695752307201" 2
>
> Thanks for letting me know.  The test looks for patterns that are
> apparently LP64-specific so I restricted it to just that data model.
>

Shouldn't it also work for x32?


-- 
H.J.

Reply via email to