On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 11:09:06AM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> So I suppose you'll either have to put these testcases into 'libgomp', or
> we'll have to invent something else?
Indeed.
> Jakub, is there a reason why for
> build-tree testing we can't just add '-I[build-tree]/libgomp' etc. in
> 'gcc.dg/gomp/gomp.exp' etc.?
I guess historic reasons. E.g. g++.dg/ adds those and -L for libstdc++ too,
but then most of the C++ tests that test primarily the compiler and
sometimes use headers and even more often the runtime library are there.
On the gomp side, libgomp/testsuite has been used for both compile and
link/runtime tests that need the runtime library and its headers, while
gcc/testsuite/*/gomp/ has been left for tests that don't need any of those.
Jakub
