On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 9:08 PM Patrick Palka via Gcc-patches
<gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
> In the testcase from the PR we are seeing excessive memory use (> 5GB)
> during constexpr evaluation, almost all of which is due to the call to
> decl_constant_value in the VAR_DECL/CONST_DECL branch of
> cxx_eval_constant_expression.  We reach here every time we evaluate an
> ARRAY_REF of a constexpr VAR_DECL, which in this testcase is quite
> often, and from there decl_constant_value makes an unshared copy of the
> VAR_DECL's initializer, even though the unsharing is not needed at this
> call site (because it is up to callers of cxx_eval_constant_expression
> to unshare).
>
> To fix this, this patch moves the responsibility of unsharing the result
> of decl_constant_value, decl_really_constant_value and
> scalar_constant_value from the callee to the caller.
>
> Fortunately there's only six calls to these functions, two of which are
> from cxx_eval_constant_expression where the unsharing is undesirable.
> And in unify there is one call, to scalar_constant_value, that looks
> like:
>
>    case CONST_DECL:
>      if (DECL_TEMPLATE_PARM_P (parm))
>        return ...;
> >    if (arg != scalar_constant_value (parm))
>        return ...;
>
> where we are suspiciously testing for pointer equality despite
> scalar_constant_value's unsharing behavior.  This line seems to be dead
> code however, so this patch replaces it with an appropriate gcc_assert.
> Finally, this patch adds an explicit call to unshare_expr to the
> remaining three callers.
>
> Now that the the calls to decl_constant_value and
> decl_really_constant_value from cxx_eval_constant_expression no longer
> unshare their result, memory use during constexpr evaluation for the
> testcase in the PR falls from 5GB to 15MB according to -ftime-report.
>
> Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, and also tested on
> cmcstl2 and a number of other libraries.  Does this look OK to commit?

Can you add the PRs testcase?  Thanks for tracking this down! (but I can't
approve the patch)

Richard.

> gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
>
>         PR c++/96197
>         * cp-gimplify.c (cp_fold_maybe_rvalue): Call unshare_expr on the
>         result of decl_constant_value.
>         * cvt.c: Include gimplify.h.
>         (ocp_convert): Call unshare_expr on the result of
>         scalar_constant_value.
>         * init.c (constant_value_1): Don't call unshare_expr here,
>         so that callers can choose whether to unshare.
>         * pt.c (tsubst_copy): Call unshare_expr on the result of
>         scalar_constant_value.
>         (unify) <case CONST_DECL>: Assert DECL_TEMPLATE_PARM_P and
>         simplify accordingly.
> ---
>  gcc/cp/cp-gimplify.c | 2 +-
>  gcc/cp/cvt.c         | 3 ++-
>  gcc/cp/init.c        | 2 +-
>  gcc/cp/pt.c          | 9 +++------
>  4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/cp/cp-gimplify.c b/gcc/cp/cp-gimplify.c
> index 0e949e29c5c..5c5c44dbc5d 100644
> --- a/gcc/cp/cp-gimplify.c
> +++ b/gcc/cp/cp-gimplify.c
> @@ -2433,7 +2433,7 @@ cp_fold_maybe_rvalue (tree x, bool rval)
>           tree v = decl_constant_value (x);
>           if (v != x && v != error_mark_node)
>             {
> -             x = v;
> +             x = unshare_expr (v);
>               continue;
>             }
>         }
> diff --git a/gcc/cp/cvt.c b/gcc/cp/cvt.c
> index c9e7b1ff044..a7e40a1fa51 100644
> --- a/gcc/cp/cvt.c
> +++ b/gcc/cp/cvt.c
> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3.  If not see
>  #include "stringpool.h"
>  #include "attribs.h"
>  #include "escaped_string.h"
> +#include "gimplify.h"
>
>  static tree convert_to_pointer_force (tree, tree, tsubst_flags_t);
>  static tree build_type_conversion (tree, tree);
> @@ -725,7 +726,7 @@ ocp_convert (tree type, tree expr, int convtype, int 
> flags,
>        e = mark_rvalue_use (e);
>        tree v = scalar_constant_value (e);
>        if (!error_operand_p (v))
> -       e = v;
> +       e = unshare_expr (v);
>      }
>    if (error_operand_p (e))
>      return error_mark_node;
> diff --git a/gcc/cp/init.c b/gcc/cp/init.c
> index ef4b3c4dc3c..bf229bd2ba5 100644
> --- a/gcc/cp/init.c
> +++ b/gcc/cp/init.c
> @@ -2343,7 +2343,7 @@ constant_value_1 (tree decl, bool strict_p, bool 
> return_aggregate_cst_ok_p)
>           && !DECL_INITIALIZED_BY_CONSTANT_EXPRESSION_P (decl)
>           && DECL_NONTRIVIALLY_INITIALIZED_P (decl))
>         break;
> -      decl = unshare_expr (init);
> +      decl = init;
>      }
>    return decl;
>  }
> diff --git a/gcc/cp/pt.c b/gcc/cp/pt.c
> index 34876788a9c..4d3ee099cea 100644
> --- a/gcc/cp/pt.c
> +++ b/gcc/cp/pt.c
> @@ -16368,7 +16368,7 @@ tsubst_copy (tree t, tree args, tsubst_flags_t 
> complain, tree in_decl)
>           return t;
>         /* If ARGS is NULL, then T is known to be non-dependent.  */
>         if (args == NULL_TREE)
> -         return scalar_constant_value (t);
> +         return unshare_expr (scalar_constant_value (t));
>
>         /* Unfortunately, we cannot just call lookup_name here.
>            Consider:
> @@ -23644,11 +23644,8 @@ unify (tree tparms, tree targs, tree parm, tree arg, 
> int strict,
>                     strict, explain_p);
>
>      case CONST_DECL:
> -      if (DECL_TEMPLATE_PARM_P (parm))
> -       return unify (tparms, targs, DECL_INITIAL (parm), arg, strict, 
> explain_p);
> -      if (arg != scalar_constant_value (parm))
> -       return unify_template_argument_mismatch (explain_p, parm, arg);
> -      return unify_success (explain_p);
> +      gcc_assert (DECL_TEMPLATE_PARM_P (parm));
> +      return unify (tparms, targs, DECL_INITIAL (parm), arg, strict, 
> explain_p);
>
>      case FIELD_DECL:
>      case TEMPLATE_DECL:
> --
> 2.28.0.rc1
>

Reply via email to