[PATCH] rs6000: Rename adjust_vectorization_cost

[Kewen.Lin via Gcc-patches]

Hi,

This trivial patch is to rename adjust_vectorization_cost to 
adjust_vect_cost_per_stmt.  Hope it's more meaningful, as well
as to avoid the confusion between the possible to be landed
function "adjust_vect_cost" and "adjust_vectorization_cost".

Even without "adjust_vect_cost", I guess it's still good?

Is it OK for trunk?

BR,
Kewen
-----
gcc/ChangeLog:

        * config/rs6000/rs6000.c (adjust_vectorization_cost): Renamed to ...
        (adjust_vect_cost_per_stmt): ... here. 
        (rs6000_add_stmt_cost): Rename adjust_vectorization_cost to
        adjust_vect_cost_per_stmt.

diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c
index f2724e792c9..4337fe42147 100644
--- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c
+++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c
@@ -5124,7 +5124,7 @@ rs6000_init_cost (struct loop *loop_info)
    compare + branch or compare + isel instructions.  */
 
 static unsigned
-adjust_vectorization_cost (enum vect_cost_for_stmt kind,
+adjust_vect_cost_per_stmt (enum vect_cost_for_stmt kind,
                           struct _stmt_vec_info *stmt_info)
 {
   if (kind == scalar_stmt && stmt_info && stmt_info->stmt
@@ -5153,7 +5153,7 @@ rs6000_add_stmt_cost (class vec_info *vinfo, void *data, 
int count,
     {
       int stmt_cost = rs6000_builtin_vectorization_cost (kind, vectype,
                                                         misalign);
-      stmt_cost += adjust_vectorization_cost (kind, stmt_info);
+      stmt_cost += adjust_vect_cost_per_stmt (kind, stmt_info);
       /* Statements in an inner loop relative to the loop being
         vectorized are weighted more heavily.  The value here is
         arbitrary and could potentially be improved with analysis.  */