Dimitar Dimitrov <dimi...@dinux.eu> writes:
> Fix test cases assumptions that target has alignment constraints.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> * gcc.dg/attr-copy-4.c: Unpacked may still have alignment of 1
> on targets with default_packed.
> * gcc.dg/c11-align-9.c: Remove AVR target filter and replace
> with default_packed filter.
OK, thanks.
Richard
>
> Signed-off-by: Dimitar Dimitrov <dimi...@dinux.eu>
> ---
> gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/attr-copy-4.c | 1 +
> gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/c11-align-9.c | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/attr-copy-4.c
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/attr-copy-4.c
> index 796724bb950..01fae3f78d4 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/attr-copy-4.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/attr-copy-4.c
> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ extern const struct PackedA packed;
>
> struct Unpacked { int i; char c; };
> Assert (__alignof (struct Unpacked) > 1);
> +/* { dg-error "size of array .* is negative" "" { target default_packed }
> .-1 } */
>
> /* Verify that copying the packed attribute to the declaration
> of an object is ignored with a warning. (There should be
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/c11-align-9.c
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/c11-align-9.c
> index 3c9cf55756e..6a0d4248f1b 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/c11-align-9.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/c11-align-9.c
> @@ -2,8 +2,8 @@
> are at least some alignment constraints), case of compound literals. */
> /* { dg-do compile } */
> /* { dg-options "-std=c11 -pedantic-errors" } */
> -/* { dg-skip-if "no alignment constraints" { "avr-*-*" } } */
>
> #include <stddef.h>
>
> -max_align_t *p = &(_Alignas (_Alignof (char)) max_align_t) { 1 }; /* {
> dg-error "reduce alignment" } */
> +max_align_t *p = &(_Alignas (_Alignof (char)) max_align_t) { 1 };
> +/* { dg-error "reduce alignment" "" { target { ! default_packed } } .-1 } */
