On 7/10/20 11:43 AM, Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches wrote:
Here's an interesting issue: in this code a ) is missing:
enum { E = (2 } e;
but we compile the code anyway, and E is set to 0 in build_enumerator,
which is sneaky.
The problem is that cp_parser_enum_specifier parses tentatively, because
when we see the enum keyword, we don't know yet if we'll find an
enum-specifier, opaque-enum-declaration, or elaborated-enum-specifier.
In this test when we call cp_parser_enumerator_list we're still parsing
tentatively, and as a consequence, parens.require_close (parser) in
cp_parser_primary_expression doesn't report any errors. But we only go
on to parse the enumerator-list after we've seen a {, at which point we
might as well commit -- we know we're dealing with an enum-specifier.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk?
ok, (with the typo Jakub noticed fixed :)
does this also fix 95288?
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
PR c++/96077
* parser.c (cp_parser_enum_specifier): Commit to tentative parse
after we've seen an opening brace.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR c++/96077
* g++.dg/parse/enum14.C: New test.
nathan
--
Nathan Sidwell
