> On Thu, 9 Jul 2020, Richard Sandiford wrote: > >> I'm trying Tree Browser during debugging, but failed. > >> I found that tree-browser.c and tree-browser.def have been removed at > >> 2015-07-25. So, to avoid misunderstanding, can we remove this > >> tree-browser page too? > > Thanks for the patch. Seems like a good idea to me. I guess the only > > question is whether we should keep it around for historical purposes, > > but with a big banner to say that it's no longer up-to-date. I also > > don't know whether we try to avoid 404s on old pages. > > Thank you, Hujp and Richard! > > We generally try to avoid 404s. So in case we remove a page put in a > redirect. > You can do so via a new entry in wwwdocs/htdocs/.htaccess (which I believe is > self explanatory, and I'm happy to help, too). > Thank you, Richard and Gerald!
Since the tree-ssa/index.html and tree-ssa/tree_browser.html are no longer up-to-date, I think it may be better to add a redirect than to update. Is there a page means the page which was redirected is no longer up-to-date? Or just redirect to index.html itself as the following, it's OK? Regards. Hujp --- diff --git a/htdocs/.htaccess b/htdocs/.htaccess index 18997d63..67ee474f 100644 --- a/htdocs/.htaccess +++ b/htdocs/.htaccess @@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ Redirect permanent /proj-optimize.html https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/optimize.ht Redirect permanent /projects.html https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/ Redirect permanent /projects/cxx1z.html https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx-status.html#cxx1z Redirect permanent /projects/web.html https://gcc.gnu.org/about.html +Redirect permanent /projects/tree-ssa/tree-browser.html https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/tree-ssa/ Redirect permanent /reghunt-howto.html https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/reghunt.html Redirect permanent /svn.html https://gcc.gnu.org/git.html Redirect permanent /svnwrite.html https://gcc.gnu.org/gitwrite.html -- > My recommendation in a case like this is to follow the approach of adding a > big > banner at the top as you suggest, Richard. That said, if the consensus by > you/those working in this area is to completely remove the page, that is > perfectly fine, too. > > Gerald >
