On Fri, 3 Jul 2020 17:41:12 +0200
Thomas Schwinge <tho...@codesourcery.com> wrote:

> Hi Julian!
> 
> On 2020-06-30T15:51:14+0200, I wrote:
> > On 2020-06-16T15:38:33-0700, Julian Brown <jul...@codesourcery.com>
> > wrote:  
> >> This is a new version of the patch last sent here:
> >>
> >> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-May/546332.html
> >>
> >> Minus the bits that Thomas has committed already (thanks!), and
> >> with adjustments to allow for GOMP_MAP_ATTACH being grouped
> >> together with a preceding clause.
> >>
> >> OK?  
> >
> > Please also update the "virtual refcount" comment in
> > 'libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/structured-dynamic-lifetimes-4.c'.
> >
> > Your patch now makes the
> > 'libgomp.oacc-fortran/mdc-refcount-1-1-1.f90',
> > 'libgomp.oacc-fortran/mdc-refcount-1-2-1.f90',
> > 'libgomp.oacc-fortran/mdc-refcount-1-2-2.f90',
> > 'libgomp.oacc-fortran/mdc-refcount-1-3-1.f90' test cases PASS (did
> > you not see that?)  
> 
> Ah, you said "Tested (as a series)", so that's probably why I saw this
> intermediate step but you didn't.
> 
> > so we have to remove all XFAILing, 'print'/'dg-output'
> > etc. from these, and it changes the error reporting in
> > 'libgomp.oacc-fortran/mdc-refcount-1-4-1.f90', so we have to adjust
> > that. See attached patch "into Adjust dynamic reference count
> > semantics".  
> 
> Given my recent "[OpenACC] Revert always-copyfrom behavior for
> 'GOMP_MAP_FORCE_FROM' in
> 'libgomp/oacc-mem.c:goacc_exit_data_internal'",
> <87wo3ky5vn.fsf@euler.schwinge.homeip.net">http://mid.mail-archive.com/87wo3ky5vn.fsf@euler.schwinge.homeip.net>,
> please also include the attached "into 'Adjust dynamic reference
> count semantics': un-XFAIL 'libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/pr92843-1.c'".
> 
> 
> > Your patch regresses the attached
> > 'libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/struct-3-1-1.c'  
> 
> That was confusing: that's a new test case, not yet in tree.

I've posted a new version of the patch here that (hopefully!) addresses
all review comments:

https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-July/549774.html

Thanks,

Julian

Reply via email to