On Dec 31, 2011, at 9:14 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 12/30/2011 04:34 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
>> So, I'm wondering why it was done this way originally:
>>
>> - static int S1; // ERROR - uses same name 9.3
>> + static int S1; // { dg-error "" } uses same name 9.3
>>
>> and not:
>>
>> - static int S1; // ERROR - uses same name 9.3
>> + static int S1; // { dg-error "uses same name 9.3" }
>
> "uses same name 9.3" sounds like a comment, not error text.
Ah, yes, we never had text matching, that would do it. Thanks.
