On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 8:16 PM Kito Cheng <kito.ch...@sifive.com> wrote: > I agree the version of G is kind of problematic for GCC implementation, > That reminds me there was a long discussion[1] last year, > The conclusion is version of G is too confusing, it might just don't > accept any version for G. > I thought it could deprecate the version for G in GCC 11 and then drop > that in GCC 12? > For riscv-isa-manual, we could ask them to add a note about the G > don't accept version? > What do you think about this?
I think it is reasonable to start a discussion in riscv-isa-manual, to try to get an official answer for what is valid and how to interpret it, instead of just making up our own rules. Jim
