"zhoukaipeng (A)" <zhoukaipe...@huawei.com> writes:
> Hi,
>
> This is a fix for pr95199.
> In vectorization, vinfo->ivexpr_map is supposed to catch those "IV base
> and/or step expressions". Just call cse_and_gimplify_to_preheader to handle
> gathering/scattering to avoid the extra variable.
>
> Bootstrap and tested on aarch64/x86_64 Linux platform. No new regression
> witnessed.
>
> Is it ok?
>
> Thanks,
> Kaipeng Zhou
>
> From 12cf9b362576735e4c584c48cd6db3d2b0f2e14b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Kaipeng Zhou <zhoukaipe...@huawei.com>
> Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 00:54:15 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] vect: Remove extra variable created for memory reference in
> loop vectorization.
>
> Vectorization create two copies of the same IV and IVOPTs does not perform
> CSE. But vinfo->ivexpr_map is supposed to catch those "IV base and/or step
> expressions". Just call cse_and_gimplify_to_preheader to handle
> gathering/scattering to avoid the extra variable.
>
> 2020-06-12 Bin Cheng <bin.ch...@linux.alibaba.com>
> Kaipeng Zhou <zhoukaipe...@huawei.com>
>
> PR tree-optimization/95199
> * tree-vect-stmts.c: Use CSE map to catch the IV step and eliminate
> extra variable.
>
> 2020-06-12 Bin Cheng <bin.ch...@linux.alibaba.com>
> Kaipeng Zhou <zhoukaipe...@huawei.com>
>
> PR tree-optimization/95199
> * gcc.dg/vect/pr95199.c: New test.
> ---
> gcc/ChangeLog | 7 +++++++
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog | 6 ++++++
> gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr95199.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c | 1 +
> 4 files changed, 31 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr95199.c
>
> diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog
> index c92582df7fe..753d70fc94b 100644
> --- a/gcc/ChangeLog
> +++ b/gcc/ChangeLog
> @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
> +2020-06-12 Bin Cheng <bin.ch...@linux.alibaba.com>
> + Kaipeng Zhou <zhoukaipe...@huawei.com>
> +
> + PR tree-optimization/95199
> + * tree-vect-stmts.c: Use CSE map to catch the IV step and eliminate
> + extra variable.
> +
> 2020-06-08 Tobias Burnus <tob...@codesourcery.com>
>
> PR lto/94848
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
> index 60d9ecca3ed..a27dd3fa072 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
> @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
> +2020-06-12 Bin Cheng <bin.ch...@linux.alibaba.com>
> + Kaipeng Zhou <zhoukaipe...@huawei.com>
> +
> + PR tree-optimization/95199
> + * gcc.dg/vect/pr95199.c: New test.
> +
> 2020-06-08 Harald Anlauf <anl...@gmx.de>
>
> PR fortran/95195
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr95199.c
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr95199.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..ec201feaec8
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr95199.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile { target aarch64-*-* } } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O3 -march=armv8.2-a+fp+sve" } */
> +
> +void
> +foo (double *a, double *b, double m, int inc_x, int inc_y)
> +{
> + int ix = 0, iy = 0;
> + for (int i = 0; i < 1000; ++i)
> + {
> + a[ix] += m * b[iy];
> + ix += inc_x;
> + iy += inc_y;
> + }
> + return ;
> +}
> +
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "add" 12 } } */
For asm tests, it's probably better to put this in aarch64/sve instead.
The scan-assembler should be a bit more precise though, since just
"add" could catch filenames like /homd/ladd/gcc. E.g. maybe it would
be clearer to make the regexp match the register operands too. (In that
case it's better to quote the regexp with {…} rather than "…", to reduce
the number of backslashes.)
> diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c b/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c
> index b24b0fe4304..26a2b143b01 100644
> --- a/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c
> +++ b/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c
> @@ -2969,6 +2969,7 @@ vect_get_strided_load_store_ops (stmt_vec_info
> stmt_info,
> tree bump = size_binop (MULT_EXPR,
> fold_convert (sizetype, unshare_expr (DR_STEP (dr))),
> size_int (TYPE_VECTOR_SUBPARTS (vectype)));
> + bump = cse_and_gimplify_to_preheader (loop_vinfo, bump);
> *dataref_bump = force_gimple_operand (bump, &stmts, true, NULL_TREE);
> if (stmts)
> gsi_insert_seq_on_edge_immediate (loop_preheader_edge (loop), stmts);
Agree it's good to do this, but using cse_and_gimplify_to_preheader
makes the force_gimple_operand and gsi_insert_seq_on_edge_immediate
redundant.
I guess we might as well do the same thing for “*vec_offset” too.
Thanks,
Richard
