On 2020-06-04 12:55 p.m., H.J. Lu wrote:
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 9:17 AM Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches
<gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:

The testcase from the PR was a dg-do run testcase that FAILed without your
patch, can't we just use that testcase (in gcc.target/i386/, restricted to
lp64 and possibly linux only to make sure frame pointer can be safely
omitted)?
Why lp64?  Shouldn't it be !ia32?

Thank you, H.J.  I'll use ! ia32.


Reply via email to