On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 5:00 PM Martin Liška <mli...@suse.cz> wrote: > > On 6/2/20 1:09 PM, Richard Biener wrote: > > So please be constructive. Like, provide a testcase that ICEs > > with the FAILs replaced by gcc_unreachable (). Martin, may I suggest > > to do this replacement and bootstrap/test? I think it would be nice > > to have testsuite coverage for the FAILs, and maybe we have that > > already. > > Hello. > > There's the suggested patch that survives bootstrap on ppc64le-linux-gnu > and passes test-suite.
OK, so can you please re-post the version of the VEC_COND_EXPR patch that uses a regular IFN (without the static non-FAIL checking) in a new thread? If there's no OK from rs6000 maintainers to remove the FAILs then we'll go ahead with that version, unless Richard objects here. Thanks, Richard. > Martin
