Like many sites over the last year(s) valgrind.org has now moved to 
https.  While there, replace the second of two links in the same vicinity 
by a purely textual reference -- easier to maintain, and in particular
also better from a user experience perspective.

Gerald

        * doc/xml/faq.xml: Adjust Valgrind reference and remove another.
        * doc/html/faq.html: Regenerate.
---
 libstdc++-v3/doc/html/faq.html | 4 ++--
 libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/faq.xml   | 4 ++--
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/doc/html/faq.html b/libstdc++-v3/doc/html/faq.html
index 18407225d7a..967e5f5f348 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/doc/html/faq.html
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/doc/html/faq.html
@@ -700,7 +700,7 @@
     of a few dozen kilobytes on startup. This pool is used to ensure it's
     possible to throw exceptions (such as <code 
class="classname">bad_alloc</code>)
     even when <code class="code">malloc</code> is unable to allocate any more 
memory.
-    With some versions of <a class="link" href="http://valgrind.org/"; 
target="_top"><span class="command"><strong>valgrind</strong></span></a>
+    With some versions of <a class="link" href="https://valgrind.org"; 
target="_top"><span class="command"><strong>valgrind</strong></span></a>
     this pool will be shown as "still reachable" when the process exits, e.g.
     <code class="code">still reachable: 72,704 bytes in 1 blocks</code>.
     This memory is not a leak, because it's still in use by libstdc++,
@@ -710,7 +710,7 @@
     </p><p>
     In the past, a few people reported that the standard containers appear
     to leak memory when tested with memory checkers such as
-    <a class="link" href="http://valgrind.org/"; target="_top"><span 
class="command"><strong>valgrind</strong></span></a>.
+    <span class="command"><strong>valgrind</strong></span>.
     Under some (non-default) configurations the library's allocators keep
     free memory in a
     pool for later reuse, rather than deallocating it with <code 
class="code">delete</code>
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/faq.xml b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/faq.xml
index cf8684e1cea..e419d3c22a0 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/faq.xml
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/faq.xml
@@ -993,7 +993,7 @@
     of a few dozen kilobytes on startup. This pool is used to ensure it's
     possible to throw exceptions (such as <classname>bad_alloc</classname>)
     even when <code>malloc</code> is unable to allocate any more memory.
-    With some versions of <link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"; 
xlink:href="http://valgrind.org/";><command>valgrind</command></link>
+    With some versions of <link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"; 
xlink:href="https://valgrind.org";><command>valgrind</command></link>
     this pool will be shown as "still reachable" when the process exits, e.g.
     <code>still reachable: 72,704 bytes in 1 blocks</code>.
     This memory is not a leak, because it's still in use by libstdc++,
@@ -1004,7 +1004,7 @@
     <para>
     In the past, a few people reported that the standard containers appear
     to leak memory when tested with memory checkers such as
-    <link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"; 
xlink:href="http://valgrind.org/";><command>valgrind</command></link>.
+    <command>valgrind</command>.
     Under some (non-default) configurations the library's allocators keep
     free memory in a
     pool for later reuse, rather than deallocating it with <code>delete</code>
-- 
2.26.2

Reply via email to