Am 15.05.20 um 22:33 schrieb Harald Anlauf:
Here's a new attempt to finally fix this PR and any known fallout.
In order to handle division by zero in declarations, but still accept the
code snippet adapted from 521.wrf_r (from spec2017), I removed the hunk
that was added to fix PR94399, and deferred the handling to a later stage.
One case regarding array shapes is handled in variable_decl in decl.c, the
other one regarding PDTs is handled in gfc_get_pdt_instance in the same
file. While at it, I improved the error message to notify the user if an
expression that should be of INTEGER type isn't.
Regtests with no new failures on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, after adjusting
error messages for test dec_structure_23.f90.
OK for trunk?
I think this is a good approach (and a better error message, too).
So, OK, and thanks for the patch!
Regards
Thomas
