On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 2:24 PM Nathan Sidwell <nat...@acm.org> wrote:
>
> My recent C++ parser change to pay attention to EOF location uncovered a
> separate bug. The preprocesor's EOF logic would set the EOF location to
> be the beginning of the last line of text in the file -- not the 'line'
> after that, which contains no characters. Mostly. This fixes things so
> that when we attempt to read the last line of the main file, we don't
> pop the buffer until the tokenizer has a chance to create an EOF token
> with the correct location information. It is then responsible for
> popping the buffer. As it happens, raw string literal tokenizing
> contained a bug -- it would increment the line number prematurely,
> because it cached buffer->cur in a local variable, but checked
> buffer->cur before updating it to figure out if it was at end of file.
> We fix up that too.
>
> The EOF token intentionally doesn't have a column number -- it's not a
> position on a line, it's a non-existant line.
>
> The testsuite churn is just correcting the EOF location diagnostics.
> This time I've made sure to check all testsuites, sorry obj-c++ folks.
>
> pushed to master.
>
> nathan
>
> --
> Nathan Sidwell
I got
ERROR: gcc.dg/unclosed-init.c: syntax error in target selector ".+1"
for " dg-error 3 "-: expected '.' at end of input" { target *-*-* }
.+1 "
ERROR: gcc.dg/unclosed-init.c: syntax error in target selector ".+1"
for " dg-error 3 "-: expected '.' at end of input" { target *-*-* }
.+1 "
ERROR: gcc.dg/unclosed-init.c: syntax error in target selector ".+1"
for " dg-error 3 "-: expected '.' at end of input" { target *-*-* }
.+1 "
ERROR: gcc.dg/unclosed-init.c: syntax error in target selector ".+1"
for " dg-error 3 "-: expected '.' at end of input" { target *-*-* }
.+1 "
ERROR: gcc.dg/unclosed-init.c: syntax error in target selector ".+1"
for " dg-error 3 "-: expected '.' at end of input" { target *-*-* }
.+1 "
ERROR: gcc.dg/unclosed-init.c: syntax error in target selector ".+1"
for " dg-error 3 "-: expected '.' at end of input" { target *-*-* }
.+1 "
on Linux/x86:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-regression/2020-May/072573.html
--
H.J.
