Hello,

The testcase attached causes ICE when compiling with
-fmodulo-sched-allow-regmoves on ARM due to reg-moves created for the
definition of mode MODE_CC.

The following is a snippet from the ddg of the definition and use of vfpcc
which triggers the creation of the reg-move:

Node num: 1
(insn 151 77 152 6 (set (reg:CCFP 127 vfpcc)
        (compare:CCFP (reg:SF 202 [ MEM[base: D.5306_32, offset: 0B] ])
            (reg:SF 183 [ D.5284 ]))) test_new.c:8 694 {*cmpsf_vfp}
     (expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg:SF 202 [ MEM[base: D.5306_32, offset: 0B] ])
        (nil)))
OUT ARCS:  [151 -(T,4,0)-> 152]
IN ARCS:  [77 -(T,3,0)-> 151]
Node num: 2
(insn 152 151 120 6 (set (reg:CCFP 24 cc)
        (reg:CCFP 127 vfpcc)) test_new.c:8 689 {*movcc_vfp}
     (expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg:CCFP 127 vfpcc)
        (nil)))
OUT ARCS:  [152 -(O,0,0)-> 144]  [152 -(T,0,0)-> 120]
IN ARCS:  [145 -(A,0,1)-> 152]  [151 -(T,4,0)-> 152]

The attached patch prevents the creation of reg-moves for definitions
with MODE_CC and thus solves this ICE.

Currently testing and bootstrap on ppc64-redhat-linux, enabling SMS on
loops with SC 1.

OK for 4.7 once testing completes?

Thanks,
Revital

Changelog:

gcc/
        * ddg.c (def_has_ccmode_p): New function.
        (add_cross_iteration_register_deps): Call it.

testsuite/
         * gcc.dg/sms-11.c: New file.
Index: ddg.c
===================================================================
--- ddg.c       (revision 182482)
+++ ddg.c       (working copy)
@@ -263,6 +263,23 @@ create_ddg_dep_no_link (ddg_ptr g, ddg_n
     add_edge_to_ddg (g, e);
 }
 
+/* Return true if one of the definitions in INSN has MODE_CC.  Otherwise
+   return false.  */
+static bool
+def_has_ccmode_p (rtx insn)
+{
+  df_ref *def;
+
+  for (def = DF_INSN_DEFS (insn); *def; def++)
+    {
+      enum machine_mode mode = GET_MODE (DF_REF_REG (*def));
+
+      if (GET_MODE_CLASS (mode) == MODE_CC)
+       return true;
+    }
+
+  return false;
+}
 
 /* Given a downwards exposed register def LAST_DEF (which is the last
    definition of that register in the bb), add inter-loop true dependences
@@ -335,7 +352,8 @@ add_cross_iteration_register_deps (ddg_p
           if (DF_REF_ID (last_def) != DF_REF_ID (first_def)
               || !flag_modulo_sched_allow_regmoves
              || JUMP_P (use_node->insn)
-              || autoinc_var_is_used_p (DF_REF_INSN (last_def), use_insn))
+              || autoinc_var_is_used_p (DF_REF_INSN (last_def), use_insn)
+             || def_has_ccmode_p (DF_REF_INSN (last_def)))
             create_ddg_dep_no_link (g, use_node, first_def_node, ANTI_DEP,
                                     REG_DEP, 1);
 
Index: testsuite/gcc.dg/sms-11.c
===================================================================
--- testsuite/gcc.dg/sms-11.c   (revision 0)
+++ testsuite/gcc.dg/sms-11.c   (revision 0)
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+/* { dg-do run } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -fmodulo-sched -fmodulo-sched-allow-regmoves 
-fdump-rtl-sms" } */
+
+extern void abort (void);
+
+float out[4][4] = { 6, 6, 7, 5, 6, 7, 5, 5, 6, 4, 4, 4, 6, 2, 3, 4 };
+
+void
+invert (void)
+{
+  int i, j, k = 0, swap;
+  float tmp[4][4] = { 5, 6, 7, 5, 6, 7, 5, 5, 4, 4, 4, 4, 3, 2, 3, 4 };
+
+  for (i = 0; i < 4; i++)
+    {
+      for (j = i + 1; j < 4; j++)
+       if (tmp[j][i] > tmp[i][i])
+         swap = j;
+
+      if (swap != i)
+       tmp[i][k] = tmp[swap][k];
+    }
+
+  for (i = 0; i < 4; i++)
+    for (j = 0; j < 4; j++)
+      if (tmp[i][j] != out[i][j])
+       abort ();
+}
+
+int
+main ()
+{
+  invert ();
+  return 0;
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { cleanup-rtl-dump "sms" } } */

Reply via email to