On 4/30/20 10:18 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 4/29/20 2:50 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
Jason,
this is the patch you suggested, as I understood it.  I kept finish_nested_require's saving of the (converted) current_template_parms, becase of the comment about use in diagnostics.

Is this what you meant?

Yes, this looks fine.

But I don't think that we need to keep saving the converted current_template_parms; diagnostics could also normalize using NULL_TREE args.  And it looks like diagnose_nested_requirement isn't currently doing re-normalization anyway.  This doesn't need to block the release, though.

Ok, I'll deal with that post-release.

Here's a modified version. The only change is to remove an assert in tsubst_nested_requirement. We have an arg_vec of 2, but only the first is filled in. Thus we think the NULL one is a dependent type.

The testcase checks we evaluate the default arg as expected.

I don't expect the bootstrap to fail, because this is removing an assert.

nathan

--
Nathan Sidwell
2020-04-30  Jason Merrill  <ja...@redhat.com>
	    Nathan Sidwell  <nat...@acm.org>

	PR c++/94827
	* constraint.cc (map_arguments): If ARGS is null, it's a
	self-mapping of parms.
	(finish_nested_requirement): Do not pass argified
	current_template_parms to normalization.
	(tsubst_nested_requirement): Don't assert no template parms.

diff --git c/gcc/cp/constraint.cc w/gcc/cp/constraint.cc
index 06161b8c8c4..5e732bb9b81 100644
--- c/gcc/cp/constraint.cc
+++ w/gcc/cp/constraint.cc
@@ -546,12 +546,16 @@ static tree
 map_arguments (tree parms, tree args)
 {
   for (tree p = parms; p; p = TREE_CHAIN (p))
-    {
-      int level;
-      int index;
-      template_parm_level_and_index (TREE_VALUE (p), &level, &index);
-      TREE_PURPOSE (p) = TMPL_ARG (args, level, index);
-    }
+    if (args)
+      {
+	int level;
+	int index;
+	template_parm_level_and_index (TREE_VALUE (p), &level, &index);
+	TREE_PURPOSE (p) = TMPL_ARG (args, level, index);
+      }
+    else
+      TREE_PURPOSE (p) = TREE_VALUE (p);
+
   return parms;
 }
 
@@ -2005,8 +2009,6 @@ tsubst_compound_requirement (tree t, tree args, subst_info info)
 static tree
 tsubst_nested_requirement (tree t, tree args, subst_info info)
 {
-  gcc_assert (!uses_template_parms (args));
-
   /* Ensure that we're in an evaluation context prior to satisfaction.  */
   tree norm = TREE_VALUE (TREE_TYPE (t));
   tree result = satisfy_constraint (norm, args, info);
@@ -2953,12 +2955,15 @@ finish_compound_requirement (location_t loc, tree expr, tree type, bool noexcept
 tree
 finish_nested_requirement (location_t loc, tree expr)
 {
+  /* Currently open template headers have dummy arg vectors, so don't
+     pass into normalization.  */
+  tree norm = normalize_constraint_expression (expr, NULL_TREE, false);
+  tree args = current_template_parms
+    ? template_parms_to_args (current_template_parms) : NULL_TREE;
+
   /* Save the normalized constraint and complete set of normalization
      arguments with the requirement.  We keep the complete set of arguments
      around for re-normalization during diagnostics.  */
-  tree args = current_template_parms
-    ? template_parms_to_args (current_template_parms) : NULL_TREE;
-  tree norm = normalize_constraint_expression (expr, args, false);
   tree info = build_tree_list (args, norm);
 
   /* Build the constraint, saving its normalization as its type.  */
diff --git c/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/concepts/pr94827.C w/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/concepts/pr94827.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..f14ec2551a1
--- /dev/null
+++ w/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/concepts/pr94827.C
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+// PR 94287 ICE looking inside open template-parm level
+// { dg-do run { target c++17 } }
+// { dg-options -fconcepts }
+
+template <typename T,
+  bool X = requires { requires (sizeof(T)==1); } >
+  int foo(T) { return X; }
+
+int main() {
+  if (!foo('4'))
+    return 1;
+  if (foo (4))
+    return 2;
+  return 0;
+}

Reply via email to