On 12/19/2011 12:47 AM, Michael Zolotukhin wrote:
> Ok, those were just attempts to adjust dg-scans in slp-perm-9.c, in
> which one more loop was vectorized when compiled with -mavx2. In fact,
> just SSSE3 isn't enough for vectorization of this loop - it seems that
> vector size also matters, so I undid changes in vect_perm and just add
> a vect-size check to the test - could you please check if the changes
> are ok?

The patch looks ok now.  Thanks.


r~

Reply via email to