On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 at 09:11, Ville Voutilainen
<ville.voutilai...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 at 04:10, kamlesh kumar <kamleshbha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Thank you for reviewing.
> > without  _Decay to decay_t in the constructor which takes inplace_type_t,
> > cases like this fails
> > auto a = std::any(std::in_place_type<std::any>, 5);
> >
> > for these constructors, standard does not say anything about
> > not-sameness checks with any.
> > https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/utility/any/any.
>
> Well, sure. Thus:
> - the in_place constructor should not _Decay
> - the constructor from T should _Decay
> - the assignment from a T should _Decay
> - emplace should not _Decay
>
> These bugs are not regressions, so presumably they can wait for stage1.

..except that two of them are. :) Anyhoo, the non-any handling needs
to be retained
for the T-constructor and the T-assignment, and removing it from
emplace is not a regression
but should be eventually done.

Reply via email to