On Mon, 20 Apr 2020, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 4/19/20 12:55 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > This PR seems to be similar to PR c++/43382, except that the recursive call
> > to
> > the variadic function with trailing return type in this testcase is
> > additionally
> > given some explicit template arguments.
> > 
> > In the first testcase below, when resolving the recursive call to 'select',
> > fn_type_unification first substitutes in the call's explicit template
> > arguments
> > before doing unification, and so during this substitution the template
> > argument
> > pack for Args is incomplete.
> > 
> > Since the pack is incomplete, the substitution of 'args...' in the trailing
> > return type decltype(f(args...)) is handled by the unsubstituted_packs case
> > of
> > tsubst_pack_expansion.  But the handling of this case happens _before_ we
> > reset
> > local_specializations, and so the substitution ends up reusing the old
> > binding
> > for 'args' from local_specializations rather than building a new one.
> > 
> > This patch fixes this issue by setting up local_specializations sooner in
> > tsubst_pack_expansion, before the handling of the unsubstituted_packs case.
> > It also adds a new policy to local_specialization_stack so that we could use
> > the
> > class here to conditionally replace local_specializations.
> > 
> > Passes 'make check-c++', does this look OK to commit after
> > bootstrap/regtesting?
> > 
> > gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
> > 
> >     PR c++/94628
> >     * cp-tree.h (lss_policy::lss_inherit): New enumerator.
> >     * pt.c (local_specialization_stack::local_specialization_stack):
> > Handle
> >     an lss_inherit policy.
> >     (local_specialization_stack::~local_specialization_stack): Likewise.
> >     (tsubst_pack_expansion): Use a local_specialization_stack instead of
> >     manually saving and restoring local_specializations.  Conditionally
> >     replace local_specializations sooner, before the handling of the
> >     unsubstituted_packs case.
> > 
> > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> > 
> >     PR c++/94628
> >     * g++.dg/cpp0x/variadic179.C: New test.
> >     * g++.dg/cpp0x/variadic180.C: New test.
> > ---
> >   gcc/cp/cp-tree.h                         |  2 +-
> >   gcc/cp/pt.c                              | 38 +++++++++++-------------
> >   gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/variadic179.C | 16 ++++++++++
> >   gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/variadic180.C | 25 ++++++++++++++++
> >   4 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> >   create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/variadic179.C
> >   create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/variadic180.C
> > 
> > diff --git a/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h b/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
> > index 000badc21ac..5b3b9507474 100644
> > --- a/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
> > +++ b/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
> > @@ -5424,7 +5424,7 @@ enum unification_kind_t {
> >   // An RAII class used to create a new pointer map for local
> >   // specializations. When the stack goes out of scope, the
> >   // previous pointer map is restored.
> > -enum lss_policy { lss_blank, lss_copy };
> > +enum lss_policy { lss_blank, lss_copy, lss_inherit };
> >   class local_specialization_stack
> >   {
> >   public:
> > diff --git a/gcc/cp/pt.c b/gcc/cp/pt.c
> > index 9e39f46a090..9cea663514d 100644
> > --- a/gcc/cp/pt.c
> > +++ b/gcc/cp/pt.c
> > @@ -83,7 +83,9 @@ static tree cur_stmt_expr;
> >   local_specialization_stack::local_specialization_stack (lss_policy policy)
> >     : saved (local_specializations)
> >   {
> > -  if (policy == lss_blank || !saved)
> > +  if (policy == lss_inherit)
> > +    ;
> 
> Maybe assert that saved is non-null?

Hmm, it looks like adding an assert to that effect breaks substituting
into the TYPE_ARG_TYPES of a variadic function template, because
local_specializations is not set up until we finish substituting into
the decl and start instantiating the body.

> 
> lss_inherit suggests to me that we could add things and then pop back to the
> previous state, which is the actual meaning of lss_copy.  Maybe lss_nop or
> lss_same instead?

Sounds good, I will commit the patch with lss_inherit changed to
lss_nop shortly (and without the assert I suppose).

> 
> OK with those changes.
> 
> > +  else if (policy == lss_blank || !saved)
> >       local_specializations = new hash_map<tree, tree>;
> >     else
> >       local_specializations = new hash_map<tree, tree>(*saved);
> > @@ -91,8 +93,11 @@ local_specialization_stack::local_specialization_stack
> > (lss_policy policy)
> >     local_specialization_stack::~local_specialization_stack ()
> >   {
> > -  delete local_specializations;
> > -  local_specializations = saved;
> > +  if (local_specializations != saved)
> > +    {
> > +      delete local_specializations;
> > +      local_specializations = saved;
> > +    }
> >   }
> >     /* True if we've recursed into fn_type_unification too many times.  */
> > @@ -12694,7 +12699,6 @@ tsubst_pack_expansion (tree t, tree args,
> > tsubst_flags_t complain,
> >     bool unsubstituted_fn_pack = false;
> >     int i, len = -1;
> >     tree result;
> > -  hash_map<tree, tree> *saved_local_specializations = NULL;
> >     bool need_local_specializations = false;
> >     int levels;
> >   @@ -12893,7 +12897,15 @@ tsubst_pack_expansion (tree t, tree args,
> > tsubst_flags_t complain,
> >     = build_extra_args (pattern, args, complain);
> >         return t;
> >       }
> > -  else if (unsubstituted_packs)
> > +
> > +  /* If NEED_LOCAL_SPECIALIZATIONS then we're in a late-specified return
> > +     type, so create our own local specializations map; the current map is
> > +     either NULL or (in the case of recursive unification) might have
> > +     bindings that we don't want to use or alter.  */
> > +  local_specialization_stack lss (need_local_specializations
> > +                             ? lss_blank : lss_inherit);
> > +
> > +  if (unsubstituted_packs)
> >       {
> >         /* There were no real arguments, we're just replacing a parameter
> >      pack with another version of itself. Substitute into the
> > @@ -12910,16 +12922,6 @@ tsubst_pack_expansion (tree t, tree args,
> > tsubst_flags_t complain,
> >       gcc_assert (len >= 0);
> >   -  if (need_local_specializations)
> > -    {
> > -      /* We're in a late-specified return type, so create our own local
> > -    specializations map; the current map is either NULL or (in the
> > -    case of recursive unification) might have bindings that we don't
> > -    want to use or alter.  */
> > -      saved_local_specializations = local_specializations;
> > -      local_specializations = new hash_map<tree, tree>;
> > -    }
> > -
> >     /* For each argument in each argument pack, substitute into the
> >        pattern.  */
> >     result = make_tree_vec (len);
> > @@ -12966,12 +12968,6 @@ tsubst_pack_expansion (tree t, tree args,
> > tsubst_flags_t complain,
> >           }
> >       }
> >   -  if (need_local_specializations)
> > -    {
> > -      delete local_specializations;
> > -      local_specializations = saved_local_specializations;
> > -    }
> > -
> >     /* If the dependent pack arguments were such that we end up with only a
> >        single pack expansion again, there's no need to keep it in a
> > TREE_VEC.  */
> >     if (len == 1 && TREE_CODE (result) == TREE_VEC
> > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/variadic179.C
> > b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/variadic179.C
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 00000000000..f04d3f753ca
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/variadic179.C
> > @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
> > +// PR c++/94628
> > +// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
> > +
> > +int f(int, int);
> > +int f(int);
> > +
> > +template<class...Args>
> > +auto select(Args... args) -> decltype(f(args...))
> > +{
> > +  if (sizeof...(Args) > 1)
> > +    return select<char>(7);
> > +  else
> > +    return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int a = select(0, 1);
> > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/variadic180.C
> > b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/variadic180.C
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 00000000000..e8fcdd0a64d
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/variadic180.C
> > @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
> > +// PR c++/94628
> > +// A variant of variadic101.C where the recursive call to deref
> > +// has its first template argument explicitly given.
> > +// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
> > +
> > +template<class T>
> > +struct Container
> > +{ T f() const; };
> > +
> > +template<class T>
> > +T deref(const T& t)
> > +{ return t; }
> > +
> > +
> > +template <class T, class... Args>
> > +auto
> > +deref(const T& u, int r, Args... args)
> > +-> decltype(deref(u.f(), args...))
> > +{ return deref<decltype(u.f())>(u.f(), args...); }
> > +
> > +int main(void)
> > +{
> > +    Container<Container<int>> v;
> > +    deref(v,1,2);
> > +}
> > 
> 
> 

Reply via email to