On Fri, 2020-03-27 at 00:26 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 05:59:36PM -0600, Jeff Law via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > Sorry. I know you asked me to look at this eons ago, but ever time I just
> > get
> > lost.
> >
> > I get the distinct impression that we could do something much simpler (the
> > patch
> > you initially proposed for backporting to the release branches). Perhaps we
> > go
> > with that now and the full patch for gcc-11?
>
> So like this?
> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux.
>
> 2020-03-26 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>
>
> PR target/93069
> * config/i386/sse.md (vec_extract_lo_<mode><mask_name>): Use
> <store_mask_constraint> instead of m in output operand constraint.
> (vec_extract_hi_<mode><mask_name>): Use <mask_operand2> instead of
> %{%3%}.
>
> * gcc.target/i386/avx512vl-pr93069.c: New test.
> * gcc.dg/vect/pr93069.c: New test.
Yea. And consider the more complete fix approved for gcc-11.
jeff
>
